Accuracy of Ultrasound in a Screening Programme for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
Authors:
- 1 January 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Medical Screening
- Vol. 1 (1) , 3-6
Abstract
To assess the accuracy of ultrasound in the measurement of aortic diameter.A general practice based screening programme for abdominal aortic aneurysm.(a) comparison of ultrasound with computed tomography (CT) measurement; (b) two period crossover study to assess interobserver error; (c) comparison of ultrasound measurements by technicians and radiologists.In 36 patients where CT showed clear maxima in anteroposterior diameter, the measurement by ultrasound was consistently less than by CT scan (mean ultrasound — CT difference — 4·4 mm, range —12·3 to 2·4 mm). There was no difference in the measurements made by different ultrasonographers, but their method of measurement produced a reading for aortic diameter less than that obtained by a vascular radiologist.These' results show that ultrasound measurement is less accurate for smaller aneurysms, consistently gives a smaller reading for aortic diameter when compared with CT measurement, but was reproducible between ultrasonographers. Monitoring and audit of aneurysm screening programmes to assess accuracy and reproducibility of ultrasound measurement is recommended.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reducing the mortality from abdominal aortic aneurysms: need for a national screening programme.BMJ, 1992
- Abdominal aortic aneurysm in 4237 screened patients: Prevalence, development and management over 6 yearsBritish Journal of Surgery, 1991
- Limitations of ultrasonography in surveillance of small abdominal aortic aneurysmsBritish Journal of Surgery, 1991
- Abdominal aortic aneurysm evaluation: Comparison of US, CT, MRI, and angiographyMagnetic Resonance Imaging, 1990
- Abdominal aortic aneurysmBritish Journal of Surgery, 1988
- Vascular surgical society of Great Britain and IrelandBritish Journal of Surgery, 1986
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986
- Growth rate of abdominal aortic aneurysms as measured by computed tomographyBritish Journal of Surgery, 1985
- Discordance in the sizing of abdominal aortic aneurysm and its significanceThe American Journal of Surgery, 1982
- The two‐period cross‐over clinical trial.British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1979