Intrasession repeatability and agreement of the anterior corneal assessment provided by a multidiagnostic device
- 17 March 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Clinical and Experimental Optometry
- Vol. 108 (2) , 135-141
Abstract
Clinical relevance: Multidiagnostic systems have recently appeared on the market. Knowledge of the repeatability and validity of any instrument is mandatory before its introduction in clinical practice. Background: The aim of this work is to examine the intrasession repeatability of anterior pole measurements provided by the multidiagnostic device Wave Analyzer Medica 700 (WAM700) and agreement with Pentacam measurements in normal eyes. Methods: In the right eyes of 113 participants, three repeat measurements of central keratometry, central corneal thickness, anterior chamber depth and corneal eccentricity were made with the WAM700 and Pentacam in random order. Intrasession repeatability and agreement were determined. Results: Employing WAM700, intrasession repeatability for keratometry, central corneal thickness and anterior chamber depth was good (ICCs >= 0.992; CV 0.48-0.98%), yet worse than the values obtained for the Pentacam (ICCs >= 0.998; CV 0-0.33%). WAM700 showed excellent intrasession repeatability when used to measure the anterior chamber depth (Sw 0.03 mm). However, the repeatability of this device was inferior for central corneal thickness (Sw 4.24 mu m) and keratometry measurements (Sw < 0.21 D) and was poor for corneal eccentricity (Sw 0.07; ICC 0.908; CV 14.58%). Agreement between WAM700 and Pentacam showed a high ICC for the keratometry measurements, central corneal thickness and anterior chamber depth (>0.972) but lower for corneal eccentricity (ICC 0.762). Conclusions: In healthy eyes, the WAM700 multidiagnostic device showed good intrasession repeatability for keratometry, central corneal thickness and anterior chamber depth measurements. Agreement between WAM700 and Pentacam was good for the anterior chamber depth measurement. However, these instruments cannot be considered interchangeable for keratometry, central corneal thickness and eccentricity readings.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Corneal topography with an aberrometry-topography systemContact Lens and Anterior Eye, 2018
- Current optometric practices and attitudes in keratoconus patient managementContact Lens and Anterior Eye, 2017
- Reliability of Pentacam HR Thickness Maps of the Entire Cornea in Normal, Post–Laser In Situ Keratomileusis, and Keratoconus EyesAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology, 2016
- Analysis of age, refractive error and gender related changes of the cornea and the anterior segment of the eye with Scheimpflug imagingContact Lens and Anterior Eye, 2015
- Scheimpflug–Placido topographer and optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer: Repeatability and agreementJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2012
- Intrasubject repeatability of corneal morphology measurements obtained with a new Scheimpflug photography–based systemJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2012
- Comparison of Corneal Powers Obtained from 4 Different DevicesAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology, 2009
- Topography-based assessment of anterior corneal curvature and asphericity as a function of age, sex, and refractive statusJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2009
- Anterior segment biometry with the Pentacam: Comprehensive assessment of repeatability of automated measurementsJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2008
- Evaluation der zentralen Hornhautbrechkraft nach myoper LASIKDer Ophthalmologe, 2007