Top Cited Papers
Open Access
Abstract
Purpose: This paper explores the dynamics of megaprojects through a power relations lens, focusing on sensemaking, temporalities and multiplicities in major projects. It provides an understanding of the political forces influencing the management, decision-making and outcomes of megaprojects. Design/methodology/approach: The paper explores how different stakeholders interpret and enact political, financial and social realities in megaprojects, utilizing some examples of case studies and theoretical analysis to reveal the complexities of these projects. The paper is conceptual, synthesizing divergent ideas and literature by integrating ideas from different domains to generate new theoretical insights. Findings: The analysis reveals the inherently political nature of megaprojects, emphasizing how the politics of sensemaking, temporalities and multiplicities in major projects influence outcomes. Research limitations/implications: The paper is conceptual and as such, all the usual strictures apply; it is the quality of its conceptualization that is significant. Practical implications: This paper suggests that a politically aware approach to project management is essential for addressing the complexities that arise from megaprojects. Project managers that understand how the politics of sensemaking, temporalities and multiplicities in major projects frame projects’ decisions and consequences can achieve better long-term outcomes. Social implications: Megaprojects have direct impact on communities, environments and public resources and leave multiple legacies. Originality/value: The paper offers a novel perspective on megaprojects, moving beyond traditional technical and managerial approaches. It emphasizes the importance of the politics of sensemaking, temporalities and multiplicities in major projects.

This publication has 113 references indexed in Scilit: