Conditions for Choice? The context for implementation of curricular pathways in the curriculum, 14‐19, in England and Wales
Author:
- Sue ButterfieldSBSue Butterfield
- 1 March 1998
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Cambridge Journal of Education
- Vol. 28 (1) , 9-20
Abstract
> The Dearing reviews of 1993 (the National Curriculum and its assessment) and 1996 (Qualifications for 16‐19 year olds) have created the context for a renewed discussion of educational ‘flexibility’ and ‘choice’. This article seeks particularly to analyse ‘choice’ within the educational and wider social contexts and to identify how far the conditions for choice exist. It suggests three main areas of difficulty: (1) contradictions in education policy, which is a site of contestation rather than coherence at a national level, and provides therefore an unstable context for choices; (2) ambivalence in the social context, in so far as ‘autonomy’ is now both the goal of education and also a prerequisite for access to education; (3) specific characteristics of educational provision which offer limited evidence of the capacity to adapt to the kinds of support and guidance for ‘choice’ which are the pre‐requisites of any meaningful implementation of the Dearing proposals.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- School Subject Preferences of Pupils in Single Sex and Co‐educational Secondary SchoolsEducational Studies, 1994
- Careers teachers: who are they and what do they do?Research Papers in Education, 1992
- Post‐16 options: young people's awareness, attitudes, intentions and influences on their choiceResearch Papers in Education, 1992
- The Careers Officer: a marginalised member of the education familySchool Organisation, 1992
- Which school? A study of parents’ choice of secondary schoolEducational Research, 1991