The association between neighborhood‐level income and cancer stage at diagnosis and survival in Alberta
Open Access
Abstract
Background: Socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with a range of health outcomes, including cancer diagnosis and survival. However, the evidence for this association is inconsistent between countries with and without single‐payer health care systems. In this study, the relationships between neighborhood‐level income, cancer stage at diagnosis, and cancer‐specific mortality in Alberta, Canada, were evaluated.Methods: The Alberta Cancer Registry was used to identify all primary cancer diagnoses between 2010 and 2020. Average neighborhood income was determined by linking the Canadian census to postal codes and was categorized into quintiles on the basis of income distribution in Alberta. Multivariable multinomial logistic regression was used to model the association between income quintile and stage at diagnosis, and the Fine–Gray proportional subdistribution hazards model was used to estimate the association between SES and cancer‐specific mortality.Results: Out of the 143,818 patients with cancer included in the study, those in lower income quintiles were significantly more likely to be diagnosed at stage III (odds ratio [OR], 1.07; 95% CI [confidence interval], 1.06–1.09) or IV (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.11–1.14) after adjusting for age and sex. Lower income quintiles also had significantly worse cancer‐specific survival for breast, colorectal, liver, lung, non‐Hodgkin lymphoma, oral cavity, pancreas, and prostate cancers.Conclusions: Disparities were observed in cancer outcomes across neighborhood‐level income groups in Alberta, which demonstrates that health inequities by SES exist in countries with single‐payer health care systems. Further research is needed to better understand the underlying causes and to develop strategies to mitigate these disparities.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cancer screening barriers and facilitators for under and never screened populations: A mixed methods studyCancer Epidemiology, 2016
- Recommendations on screening for lung cancerCanadian Medical Association Journal, 2016
- Individual socioeconomic status and breast cancer diagnostic stages: a French case–control studyEuropean Journal of Public Health, 2016
- ggplot22016
- Associations among socioeconomic status, patterns of care, and outcomes in breast cancer patients in a universal health care system: Ontario's experienceCancer, 2015
- Impact of socioeconomic status on incidence, mortality, and survival of colorectal cancer patients: a systematic reviewGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2014
- The impact of socioeconomic status on stage of cancer at diagnosis and survivalCancer, 2010
- A Proportional Hazards Model for the Subdistribution of a Competing RiskJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1999
- Socioeconomic status and cancer survival in Ontario.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1997
- Partial residuals for the proportional hazards regression modelBiometrika, 1982