The Linguistic Inaccessibility of U.S. Higher Education and the Inherent Inequity of U.S. IEPs: An Argument for Multilingual Higher Education
Author:
- 1 July 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Bilingual Research Journal
- Vol. 26 (2) , 309-326
Abstract
Should a diploma from a U.S. university imply that the recipient received instruction only in English? If there is bilingual and multilingual education in the K–12 system, why not in higher education? While custom dictates higher education in only English, it has significant, if rarely discussed drawbacks. This article critically examines the popular practice of requiring higher education students in the United States to first demonstrate English proficiency before pursuing a degree and proposes abandoning this practice in favor of a model in which university professors employ sheltered techniques, translated portions of their lecture notes, and bilingual teaching assistants to impart their instruction. In addition, concurrent English for academic purposes (EAP) instruction, closely coordinated with the academic classes, is proposed. Such a model serves language minority and international students more equitably and efficiently and provides numerous benefits for U.S. universities as well.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- English in Asian Bilingual Education: From Hatred to HarmonyJournal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 1996
- Unpeeling the Onion: Language Planning and Policy and the ELT ProfessionalTESOL Quarterly, 1996
- English-Only and Standard English Ideologies in the U.S.TESOL Quarterly, 1996
- Academic Oral Communication Needs of EAP Learners: What Subject-Matter Instructors Actually RequireTESOL Quarterly, 1996
- Reversing Language Shift1991
- Second-Language Acquisition Through Subject-Matter Learning: A Study of Sheltered Psychology Classes at the University of OttawaThe Canadian Modern Language Review, 1984