Conceptualizing neurodevelopmental disorders through a mechanistic understanding of fragile X syndrome and Williams syndrome
- 1 April 2012
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Current Opinion in Neurology
- Vol. 25 (2) , 112-124
Abstract
Purpose of review The overarching goal of this review is to compare and contrast the cognitive–behavioral features of fragile X syndrome (FraX) and Williams syndrome and to review the putative neural and molecular underpinnings of these features. Information is presented in a framework that provides guiding principles for conceptualizing gene–brain–behavior associations in neurodevelopmental disorders. Recent findings Abnormalities, in particular cognitive–behavioral domains with similarities in underlying neurodevelopmental correlates, occur in both FraX and Williams syndrome including aberrant frontostriatal pathways leading to executive function deficits, and magnocellular/dorsal visual stream, superior parietal lobe, inferior parietal lobe, and postcentral gyrus abnormalities contributing to deficits in visuospatial function. Compelling cognitive–behavioral and neurodevelopmental contrasts also exist in these two disorders, for example, aberrant amygdala and fusiform cortex structure and function occurring in the context of contrasting social behavioral phenotypes, and temporal cortical and cerebellar abnormalities potentially underlying differences in language function. Abnormal dendritic development is a shared neurodevelopmental morphologic feature between FraX and Williams syndrome. Commonalities in molecular machinery and processes across FraX and Williams syndrome occur as well – microRNAs involved in translational regulation of major synaptic proteins; scaffolding proteins in excitatory synapses; and proteins involved in axonal development. Summary Although the genetic variations leading to FraX and Williams syndrome are different, important similarities and contrasts in the phenotype, neurocircuitry, molecular machinery, and cellular processes in these two disorders allow for a unique approach to conceptualizing gene–brain–behavior links occurring in neurodevelopmental disorders.Keywords
This publication has 135 references indexed in Scilit:
- A multimeasure approach to investigating affective appraisal of social information in Williams syndromeJournal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 2011
- Contributions of phonological and verbal working memory to language development in adolescents with fragile X syndromeJournal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 2011
- Language and sociability: insights from Williams syndromeJournal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 2011
- Autonomic regulation in fragile X syndromeDevelopmental Psychobiology, 2011
- Brief Report: Sensorimotor Gating in Idiopathic Autism and Autism Associated with Fragile X SyndromeJournal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2010
- A preliminary study of orbitofrontal activation and hypersociability in Williams SyndromeJournal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 2010
- Teasing apart the heterogeneity of autism: Same behavior, different brains in toddlers with fragile X syndrome and autismJournal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 2009
- Cholinergic dysfunction in fragile X syndrome and potential intervention: A preliminary 1H MRS studyAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 2009
- Morphometric Spatial Patterns Differentiating Boys With Fragile X Syndrome, Typically Developing Boys, and Developmentally Delayed Boys Aged 1 to 3 YearsArchives of General Psychiatry, 2008
- Neuroanatomy of fragile X syndrome is associated with aberrant behavior and the fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP)Annals of Neurology, 2007