The Need For Continuous and Comprehensive Sampling of Effort/Response Bias During Neuropsychological Examinations
- 1 May 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Clinical Neuropsychologist
- Vol. 23 (4) , 729-741
Abstract
While most neuropsychologists are now administering measures of response bias in neuropsychological evaluations, it is still likely that detection of non-credible test performance is inadequate due to faulty assumptions regarding poor effort, namely that it remains constant across a battery of tests. Four cases are described that illustrate the variability in negative response bias that occurs during neuropsychological evaluations; if effort had not been periodically sampled with heterogeneous types of effort indicators during these examinations, the suspect performance would not have been detected. These examples argue for both continuous and comprehensive sampling of effort, specifically that negative response bias be routinely monitored throughout neuropsychological evaluations, and that effort indicators involving differing cognitive abilities be employed to assess for feigning of selective deficits.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Relationship of IQ to Effort Test PerformanceThe Clinical Neuropsychologist, 2008
- American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology (AACN) Practice Guidelines for Neuropsychological Assessment and ConsultationThe Clinical Neuropsychologist, 2007
- Sensitivity and Specificity of Various Digit Span Scores in the Detection of Suspect EffortThe Clinical Neuropsychologist, 2006
- The neuropsychological impact of sports-related concussion: A meta-analysisJournal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 2005
- Symptom validity assessment: Practice issues and medical necessityNAN Policy & Planning CommitteeArchives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 2005
- Factors moderating neuropsychological outcomes following mild traumatic brain injury: A meta-analysisJournal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 2005
- Comparison of various RAVLT scores in the detection of noncredible memory performanceArchives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 2005
- SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY OF FINGER TAPPING TEST SCORES FOR THE DETECTION OF SUSPECT EFFORTThe Clinical Neuropsychologist, 2005
- Motivation and Neuropsychological Test Performance Following Mild Head InjuryJournal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 2003
- The Rey 15-Item Recognition Trial: A Technique to Enhance Sensitivity of the Rey 15-Item Memorization TestJournal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 2002