The effect of psychotherapy for depression on improvements in social functioning: a meta-analysis
- 28 January 2014
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Psychological Medicine
- Vol. 44 (14) , 2913-2926
Abstract
Background: Patients with depression often report impairments in social functioning. From a patient perspective, improvements in social functioning might be an important outcome in psychotherapy for depression. Therefore, it is important to examine the effects of psychotherapy on social functioning in patients with depression.Method: We conducted a meta-analysis on studies of psychotherapy for depression that reported results for social functioning at post-treatment. Only studies that compared psychotherapy to a control condition were included (31 studies with 2956 patients).Results: The effect size of psychotherapy on social functioning was small to moderate, before [Hedges' g = 0.46, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.32–0.60] and after adjusting for publication bias (g = 0.40, 95% CI 0.25–0.55). Univariate moderator analyses revealed that studies using care as usual as a control group versus other control groups yielded lower effect sizes, whereas studies conducted in the USA versus other countries and studies that used clinician-rated instruments versus self-report yielded higher effect sizes. Higher quality studies yielded lower effect sizes whereas the number of treatment sessions and the effect size of depressive symptoms were positively related to the effect size of social functioning. When controlling for these and additional characteristics simultaneously in multivariate meta-regression, the effect size of depressive symptoms, treatment format and number of sessions were significant predictors. The effect size of social functioning remained marginally significant, indicating that improvements in social functioning are not fully explained by improvements in depressive symptoms.Conclusions: Psychotherapy for depression results in small to moderate improvements in social functioning. These improvements are strongly associated with, but not fully explained by, improvements in depressive symptoms.Keywords
This publication has 58 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparative Efficacy of Seven Psychotherapeutic Interventions for Patients with Depression: A Network Meta-AnalysisPLOS Medicine, 2013
- The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trialsBMJ, 2011
- Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Depression in Parkinson's Disease: A Randomized, Controlled TrialAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 2011
- Change in psychosocial functioning and depressive symptoms during acute-phase cognitive therapy for depressionPsychological Medicine, 2011
- Self-reported versus clinician-rated symptoms of depression as outcome measures in psychotherapy research on depression: A meta-analysisClinical Psychology Review, 2010
- Deterioration in psychosocial functioning predicts relapse/recurrence after cognitive therapy for depressionJournal of Affective Disorders, 2009
- Psychological treatment of depression: A meta-analytic database of randomized studiesBMC Psychiatry, 2008
- The Burden of Mental DisordersEpidemiologic Reviews, 2008
- Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysesBMJ, 2003
- The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Medical Care, 1992