Influence of Data Distribution on Federated Learning Performance in Tumor Segmentation
- 1 May 2023
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in Radiology: Artificial Intelligence
- Vol. 5 (3) , e220082
Abstract
To investigate the correlation between differences in data distributions and federated deep learning (Fed-DL) algorithm performance in tumor segmentation on CT and MR images. Two Fed-DL datasets were retrospectively collected (from November 2020 to December 2021): one dataset of liver tumor CT images (Federated Imaging in Liver Tumor Segmentation [or, FILTS]; three sites, 692 scans) and one publicly available dataset of brain tumor MR images (Federated Tumor Segmentation [or, FeTS]; 23 sites, 1251 scans). Scans from both datasets were grouped according to site, tumor type, tumor size, dataset size, and tumor intensity. To quantify differences in data distributions, the following four distance metrics were calculated: earth mover’s distance (EMD), Bhattacharyya distance (BD), χ2 distance (CSD), and Kolmogorov-Smirnov distance (KSD). Both federated and centralized nnU-Net models were trained by using the same grouped datasets. Fed-DL model performance was evaluated by using the ratio of Dice coefficients, θ, between federated and centralized models trained and tested on the same 80:20 split datasets. The Dice coefficient ratio (θ) between federated and centralized models was strongly negatively correlated with the distances between data distributions, with correlation coefficients of −0.920 for EMD, −0.893 for BD, and −0.899 for CSD. However, KSD was weakly correlated with θ, with a correlation coefficient of −0.479. Performance of Fed-DL models in tumor segmentation on CT and MRI datasets was strongly negatively correlated with the distances between data distributions. Keywords: CT, Abdomen/GI, Liver, Comparative Studies, MR Imaging, Brain/Brain Stem, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Federated Deep Learning, Tumor Segmentation, Data Distribution Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2023 See also the commentary by Kwak and Bai in this issue.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute (R42CA189637)
- Children’s Tumor Foundation (CTF-2021-10-02)
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- REFUGE Challenge: A unified framework for evaluating automated methods for glaucoma assessment from fundus photographsMedical Image Analysis, 2020
- Federated Machine LearningACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 2019
- Multi-institutional Deep Learning Modeling Without Sharing Patient Data: A Feasibility Study on Brain Tumor Segmentation2019
- The HAM10000 dataset, a large collection of multi-source dermatoscopic images of common pigmented skin lesionsScientific Data, 2018
- Seven-Point Checklist and Skin Lesion Classification Using Multitask Multimodal Neural NetsIEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 2018
- ITK-SNAP: An interactive tool for semi-automatic segmentation of multi-modality biomedical images2016
- The Multimodal Brain Tumor Image Segmentation Benchmark (BRATS)IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 2015
- Evaluation of prostate segmentation algorithms for MRI: The PROMISE12 challengeMedical Image Analysis, 2014
- The Earth Mover's Distance as a Metric for Image RetrievalInternational Journal of Computer Vision, 2000
- The Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Goodness of FitJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1951