Preliminary Evaluation of Psychoeducational Support Interventions on Quality of Life in Rural Breast Cancer Survivors After Primary Treatment
- 1 September 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Cancer Nursing
- Vol. 32 (5) , 385-397
Abstract
Although most cancer survivors are at risk for being lost in the transition from treatment to survivorship, rural breast cancer survivors face special challenges that might place them at particular risk. This small-scale preliminary study had 2 specific aims: (aim 1) establish the feasibility of rural breast cancer survivors participation in a longitudinal quality of life (QOL) intervention trial and (aim 2) determine the effects of the Breast Cancer Education Intervention (BCEI) on overall QOL. Fifty-three rural breast cancer survivors were randomized to either an experimental (n = 27) or a wait-control arm (n = 26). Participants in the experimental arm received the BCEI consisting of 3 face-to-face education and support sessions and 2 face-to-face and 3 telephone follow-up sessions, along with supplemental written and audiotape materials over a 6-month period. Breast Cancer Education Intervention modules and interventions are organized within a QOL framework. To address the possible effects of attention, wait-control participants received 3 face-to-face sessions and 3 telephone sessions during the first 6 months of participation in the study, but not the BCEI intervention. Research questions addressing aim 1 were as follows: (a) can rural breast cancer survivors be recruited into a longitudinal intervention trial, and (b) can their participation be retained. Research questions for aim 2 were as follows: (a) do participants who received the BCEI show improvement in overall QOL, and (b) is the QOL improvement sustained over time. Data were analyzed using repeated-measures general linear mixed models. Results demonstrated the ability to recruit and retain 53 rural breast cancer survivors, that the experimental arm showed improvement in overall QOL (P = .013), and that there were significant differences in overall QOL between the experimental and wait-control groups at both months 3 and 6. Thus, it appears that at least some rural breast cancer survivors can and will participate in a larger trial and will maintain their participation and that those that do participate experience significant QOL benefit.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation of a visit preparation intervention implemented in two rural, underserved counties of Northern CaliforniaPatient Education and Counseling, 2006
- Travel Distance and Season of Diagnosis Affect Treatment Choices for Women with Early-stage Breast Cancer in A Predominantly Rural Population (United States)Cancer Causes & Control, 2006
- Re: Long‐term survival following breast cancer surgery in Western AustraliaAnz Journal of Surgery, 2006
- Self‐efficacy, coping, and difficulties interacting with health care professionals among women living with breast cancer in rural communitiesPsycho-Oncology, 2005
- Quality-of-Life Concerns of African American Breast Cancer Survivors Within Rural North Carolina: Blending the Techniques of Photovoice and Grounded TheoryQualitative Health Research, 2005
- Racial differences in knowledge, attitudes, and cancer screening practices among a triracial rural populationCancer, 2004
- Breast and cervical carcinoma screening practices among women in rural and nonrural areas of the United States, 1998–1999Cancer, 2002
- Cancer Survivorship Research Among Ethnic Minority and Medically Underserved GroupsOncology Nursing Forum, 2002
- An evaluation of the quality of life among long-term survivors of breast cancerBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 1996
- Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear modelsBiometrika, 1986