Influence of sample surface height for evaluation of peak extraction algorithms in confocal microscopy
- 30 July 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Optica Publishing Group in Applied Optics
- Vol. 57 (22) , 6516-6526
Abstract
The axial resolution of confocal microscopy is not only dependent on optical characteristics but also on the utilized peak extraction algorithms. In previous evaluations of peak extraction algorithms, sample surface height is generally assumed to be zero, and only sampling-noise-induced peak extraction uncertainty was analyzed. Here we propose a sample surface-height-dependent (SHD) evaluation model that takes the combined considerations of sample surface height and noise for comparisons of algorithms’ performances. Monte Carlo simulations were first conducted on the centroid algorithm and several nonlinear fitting algorithms such as the parabola fitting algorithm, Gaussian fitting algorithm, and fitting algorithm. Subsequently, the evaluation indicators, including mean peak extraction error and mean uncertainty were suggested for the algorithms’ performance ranking. Finally, experimental verifications of the SHD model were carried out using a fiber-based chromatic confocal system. From our simulations and experiments, we demonstrate that sample surface height is a critical influencing factor in peak extraction computation in terms of both the accuracy and standard deviations. Compared to the conventional standard uncertainty evaluation model, our SHD model can provide a more comprehensive characterization of peak extraction algorithms’ performance and offer a more flexible and consistent reference for algorithm selection.
Keywords
Funding Information
- Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (2017AAA001)
- Wuhan Youth Science and Technology Plan (2016070204010142)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (51675167)
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Optimal 3D single-molecule localization for superresolution microscopy with aberrations and engineered point spread functionsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2011
- Micro-pixel accuracy centroid displacement estimation and detector calibrationProceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 2011
- Minimum zone evaluation of the form errors of quadric surfacesPrecision Engineering, 2010
- Axial performance parameters developed for analytical design of center shaded filter in high aperture focusing systemOptics Communications, 2010
- Accuracy analysis of centroid calculated by a modified center detection algorithm for Shack–Hartmann wavefront sensorOptics Communications, 2008
- Maximum a posteriori estimation of wave-front slopes using a Shack–Hartmann wave-front sensorJournal of the Optical Society of America A, 1997
- Influence of spherical aberration on axial imaging of confocal reflection microscopyApplied Optics, 1994
- Confocal surface profiling utilizing chromatic aberrationScanning, 1992
- Size of the detector in confocal imaging systemsOptics Letters, 1987
- Cramér–Rao lower bounds on the performance of charge-coupled-device optical position estimatorsJournal of the Optical Society of America A, 1986