Stakeholder engagement in European brain research: Experiences of the Lifebrain consortium
Authors:
- Isabelle Budin‐LjøsneIBIsabelle Budin‐Ljøsne
- William F. C. BaaréWBWilliam F. C. Baaré
- David Bartrés‐FazDBDavid Bartrés‐Faz
- Christian A. DrevonCDChristian A. Drevon
- Klaus P. EbmeierKEKlaus P. Ebmeier
- Anders M. FjellAFAnders M. Fjell
- Paolo GhislettaPaolo Ghisletta
- Richard N. HensonRHRichard N. Henson
- Rogier KievitRKRogier Kievit
- Kathrine S. MadsenKMKathrine S. Madsen
Open Access
- 29 March 2023
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Health Expectations
- Vol. 26 (3) , 1318-1326
Abstract
Introduction: Stakeholder engagement remains scarce in basic brain research. However, it can greatly improve the relevance of investigations and accelerate the translation of study findings to policy. The Lifebrain consortium investigated risk and protective factors influencing brain health using cognition, lifestyle and imaging data from European cohorts. Stakeholder activities of Lifebrain—organized in a separate work package—included organizing stakeholder events, investigating public perceptions of brain health and dissemination. Here, we describe the experiences of researchers and stakeholders regarding stakeholder engagement in the Lifebrain project.Methods: Stakeholder engagement in Lifebrain was evaluated through surveys among researchers and stakeholders and stakeholders' feedback at stakeholder events through evaluation forms. Survey data were analysed using a simple content analysis approach, and results from evaluation forms were summarized after reviewing the frequency of responses.Results: Consortium researchers and stakeholders experienced the engagement activities as meaningful and relevant. Researchers highlighted that it made the research and research processes more visible and contributed to new networks, optimized data collection on brain health perceptions and the production of papers and provided insights into stakeholder views. Stakeholders found research activities conducted in the stakeholder engagement work package to be within their field of interest and research results relevant to their work. Researchers identified barriers to stakeholder engagement, including lack of time, difficulties in identifying relevant stakeholders, and challenges in communicating complex scientific issues in lay language and maintaining relationships with stakeholders over time. Stakeholders identified barriers such as lack of budget, limited resources in their organization, time constraints and insufficient communication between researchers and stakeholders.Conclusion: Stakeholder engagement in basic brain research can greatly benefit researchers and stakeholders alike. Its success is conditional on dedicated human and financial resources, clear communication, transparent mutual expectations and clear roles and responsibilities.Public Contribution: Patient organizations, research networks, policymakers and members of the general public were involved in engagement and research activities throughout the project duration.Keywords
Funding Information
- Directorate-General XII, Science, Research, and Development (732592)
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Early assessment of the 10-step patient engagement framework for patient-centred outcomes research studies: the first three stepsFamily Practice, 2017
- Stakeholder engagement in policy development: challenges and opportunities for human genomicsGenetics in Medicine, 2015
- Evaluating patient and stakeholder engagement in research: moving from theory to practiceJournal of Comparative Effectiveness Research, 2015
- Rethinking the relationship between science and society: Has there been a shift in attitudes to Patient and Public Involvement and Public Engagement in Science in the United Kingdom?Health Expectations, 2014
- A Systematic Review of Stakeholder Engagement in Comparative Effectiveness and Patient-Centered Outcomes ResearchJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2014
- Patient engagement in research: a systematic reviewBMC Health Services Research, 2014
- Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic reviewHealth Expectations, 2012
- Stakeholder participation in comparative effectiveness research: defining a framework for effective engagementJournal of Comparative Effectiveness Research, 2012
- The Broad Challenge of Public Engagement in ScienceScience and Engineering Ethics, 2011
- The qualitative content analysis processJournal of Advanced Nursing, 2008