AI-VOICE: A Method to Measure and Incorporate Patient Utilities Into AI-Informed Healthcare Workflows
Preprint
Abstract
Background: Patients are important participants in their medical care, yet artificial intelligence (AI) models are used to guide care with minimal patient input. This limitation is made partially worse due to a paucity of rigorous methods to measure and incorporate patient values of the tradeoffs inherent in AI applications. This paper presents AI-VOICE (Values-Oriented Implementation and Context Evaluation), a novel method to collect patient values, or utilities, of the downstream consequences stemming from an AI model’s use to guide care. The results are then used to select the model’s risk threshold, offering a mechanism by which an algorithm can concretely reflect patient values. Methods: The entity being evaluated by AI-VOICE is an AI-informed workflow , which is composed of the patient’s health state, an action triggered by the AI model, and the benefits and harms accrued as a consequence of that action. The utilities of these workflows are measured through a survey-based, standard gamble experiment. These utilities define a patient-specific ratio of the cost of an inaccurate prediction versus the benefits of an accurate one. This ratio is mapped to the receiver-operator-characteristic curve to identify the risk threshold that reflects the patient’s values. The survey instrument is made freely available to researchers through a web-based application. Results: A demonstration of AI-VOICE is provided using a hypothetical sepsis prediction algorithm. Conclusion: AI-VOICE offers an accessible, quantitative method to incorporate patient values into AI-informed healthcare workflows.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Artificial intelligence in (gastrointestinal) healthcare: patients’ and physicians’ perspectivesScientific Reports, 2022
- Patient and public involvement to build trust in artificial intelligence: A framework, tools, and case studiesPatterns, 2022
- Patient apprehensions about the use of artificial intelligence in healthcarenpj Digital Medicine, 2021
- A Framework to Evaluate Ethical Considerations with ML-HCA Applications—Valuable, Even Necessary, but Never ComprehensiveThe American Journal of Bioethics, 2020
- Comparison of Readability of Official Public Health Information About COVID-19 on Websites of International Agencies and the Governments of 15 CountriesJAMA Network Open, 2020
- Patient Perspectives on the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Skin Cancer ScreeningJAMA Dermatology, 2020
- Incidence and Trends of Sepsis in US Hospitals Using Clinical vs Claims Data, 2009-2014JAMA, 2017
- Measurement and Valuation of Health for Economic Evaluation2017
- Fallacy of the Five-Year Survival in Lung CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978
- Primer on Certain Elements of Medical Decision MakingNew England Journal of Medicine, 1975