Leveraging LLMs to Assess Tutor Moves in Real-Life Dialogues: A Feasibility Study
Preprint
Abstract
Tutoring improves student achievement, but identifying and studying what tutoring actions are most associated with student learning at scale based on audio transcriptions is an open research problem. This present study investigates the feasibility and scalability of using generative AI to identify and evaluate specific tutor moves in real-life math tutoring. We analyze 50 randomly selected transcripts of college-student remote tutors assisting middle school students in mathematics. Using GPT-4, GPT-4o, GPT-4-turbo, Gemini-1.5-pro, and LearnLM, we assess tutors' application of two tutor skills: delivering effective praise and responding to student math errors. All models reliably detected relevant situations, for example, tutors providing praise to students (94-98% accuracy) and a student making a math error (82-88% accuracy) and effectively evaluated the tutors' adherence to tutoring best practices, aligning closely with human judgments (83-89% and 73-77%, respectively). We propose a cost-effective prompting strategy and discuss practical implications for using large language models to support scalable assessment in authentic settings. This work further contributes LLM prompts to support reproducibility and research in AI-supported learning.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Is it a good move? Mining effective tutoring strategies from human–human tutorial dialoguesFuture Generation Computer Systems, 2022
- Chain-Of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models2022
- The Impressive Effects of Tutoring on PreK-12 Learning: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Experimental Evidence2020
- The Role of the Lecturer as Tutor: Doing What Effective Tutors Do in a Large Lecture ClassCBE—Life Sciences Education, 2012