Are Attention Check Questions a Threat to Scale Validity?
Top Cited Papers
- 24 August 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Applied Psychology
- Vol. 67 (2) , 264-283
Abstract
Attention checks have become increasingly popular in survey research as a means to filter out careless respondents. Despite their widespread use, little research has empirically tested the impact of attention checks on scale validity. In fact, because attention checks can induce a more deliberative mindset in survey respondents, they may change the way respondents answer survey questions, posing a threat to scale validity. In two studies, we tested this hypothesis ( N = 816). We examined whether common attention checks—instructed‐response items (Study 1) and an instructional manipulation check (Study 2)—impact responses to a well‐validated management scale. Results showed no evidence that they affect scale validity, both in reported scale means and tests of measurement invariance. These findings allow researchers to justify the use of attention checks without compromising scale validity and encourage future research to examine other survey characteristic‐respondent dynamics to advance our use of survey methods.Keywords
All Related Versions
Funding Information
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Amazon's Mechanical TurkPerspectives on Psychological Science, 2011
- Conscious thought beats deliberation without attention in diagnostic decision-making: at least when you are an expertPsychological Research, 2010
- The Devil Is in the Deliberation: Thinking Too Much Reduces Preference ConsistencyJournal of Consumer Research, 2009
- Treatment Spillover Effects across Survey ExperimentsPolitical Analysis, 2009
- Ascertaining the validity of individual protocols from Web-based personality inventoriesJournal of Research in Personality, 2005
- Thinking too Much or too Little? The Effects of Introspection on the Decision-Making ProcessPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1999
- The Appraisal of Life Events (ALE) scale: Reliability and validityBritish Journal of Health Psychology, 1999
- Thinking too much: Introspection can reduce the quality of preferences and decisions.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1991
- Factors Defined by Negatively Keyed Items: The Result of Careless Respondents?Applied Psychological Measurement, 1985
- Construct validity in psychological tests.Psychological Bulletin, 1955