Comparaison sonde à double ballonnet-dinoprostone pour la maturation cervicale chez les femmes obèses à terme
Authors:
- 1 October 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Gynécologie Obstétrique Fertilité & Sénologie
- Vol. 45 (10) , 521-527
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Maturation cervicale par double ballonnet et dinoprostone en cas de col utérin très défavorableGynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité, 2015
- Obesity in pregnancyBest Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2015
- Double-balloon catheter vs. dinoprostone vaginal insert for induction of labor with an unfavorable cervixArchives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2014
- Maturation cervicale : y a-t-il un avantage à utiliser un double ballonnet pour le déclenchement du travail ?Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité, 2014
- Foley Catheter Compared With the Controlled-Release Dinoprostone InsertObstetrics & Gynecology, 2014
- Effect of routine controlled cord traction as part of the active management of the third stage of labour on postpartum haemorrhage: multicentre randomised controlled trial (TRACOR)BMJ, 2013
- A randomized trial of preinduction cervical ripening: dinoprostone vaginal insert versus double-balloon catheterAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2012
- Obesity and cervical ripening failure riskThe Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 2011
- ACOG Practice Bulletin #70Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2005
- A randomized comparison of prostaglandin E oxytocin, and the double-balloon device in inducing laborObstetrics & Gynecology, 1996