Comparative risk of acute myocardial infarction for anti-osteoporosis drugs in primary care: a meta-analysis of propensity-matched cohort findings from the UK Clinical Practice Research Database and the Catalan SIDIAP Database
Authors:
- 9 February 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Osteoporosis International
- Vol. 33 (7) , 1579-1589
Abstract
Summary The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of acute myocardial infarction in patients taking osteoporosis medication. Patients were taken from the SIDIAP or CPRD database and were matched using propensity scores. Patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease taking SERMs were at an increased risk. The results favour the cardiovascular safety of alendronate as a first-line choice for osteoporosis treatment. Introduction This study aims to evaluate the comparative safety of anti-osteoporosis drugs based on the observed risk of acute myocardial infarction while on treatment in a primary care setting. Methods This is a propensity-matched cohort study and meta-analysis. This study was conducted in two primary care record databases covering UK NHS (CPRD) and Catalan healthcare (SIDIAP) patients during 1995–2014 and 2006–2014, respectively. The outcome was acute myocardial infarction while on treatment. Users of alendronate (reference group) were compared to those of (1) other oral bisphosphonates (OBP), (2) strontium ranelate (SR), and (3) selective oestrogen receptor modulator (SERM), after matching on baseline characteristics (socio-demographics, fracture risk factors, comorbidities, and concomitant drug use) using propensity scores. Multiple imputation was used to handle missing data on confounders and competing risk modelling for the calculation of relative risk (sub-distribution hazard ratios (SHR)) according to therapy. Country-specific data were analysed individually and meta-analysed. Results A 10% increased risk of acute myocardial infarction was found in users of other bisphosphonates as compared to alendronate users within CPRD. The meta-analysis of CPRD and SIDIAP results showed a 9% increased risk in users of other bisphosphonate as compared to alendronate users. Sensitivity analysis showed SERMS users with diabetes and chronic kidney disease were at an elevated risk. Conclusions This study provides additional data on the risk of acute myocardial infarction in patients receiving osteoporosis treatment. The results favour the cardiovascular safety of alendronate as a first-line choice for osteoporosis treatment.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Osteoporosis Society
- National Institute for Health Research Clinician Scientist Award (CS-2013-13-012)
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at the University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- A large prospective European cohort study of patients treated with strontium ranelate and followed up over 3 yearsRheumatology International, 2013
- Alendronate and Raloxifene Use Related to Cardiovascular Diseases: Differentiation by Different Dosing Regimens of AlendronateClinical Therapeutics, 2011
- Validity of diagnostic coding within the General Practice Research Database: a systematic reviewBritish Journal of General Practice, 2010
- Validation and validity of diagnoses in the General Practice Research Database: a systematic reviewBritish Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2009
- Determining the predictive value of Read/OXMIS codes to identify incident acute myocardial infarction in the General Practice Research DatabasePharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 2008
- Zoledronic Acid and Clinical Fractures and Mortality after Hip FractureNew England Journal of Medicine, 2007
- Competing risk analysis using R: an easy guide for cliniciansBone Marrow Transplantation, 2007
- Effect of Raloxifene on Cardiovascular Adverse Events in Postmenopausal Women With OsteoporosisThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2006
- Readers guide to critical appraisal of cohort studies: 3. Analytical strategies to reduce confoundingBMJ, 2005
- A Proportional Hazards Model for the Subdistribution of a Competing RiskJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1999