Using Directed Acyclic Graphs to detect limitations of traditional regression in longitudinal studies
Open Access
- 14 September 2010
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in International Journal of Public Health
- Vol. 55 (6) , 701-703
Abstract
Longitudinal data are increasingly available to health researchers; these present challenges not encountered in cross-sectional data, not the least of which is the presence of time-varying confounding variables and intermediate effects. We review confounding and mediation in a longitudinal setting and introduce causal graphs to explain the bias that arises from conventional analyses. When both time-varying confounding and mediation are present in the data, traditional regression models result in estimates of effect coefficients that are systematically incorrect, or biased. In a companion paper (Moodie and Stephens in Int J Publ Health, 2010b , this issue), we describe a class of models that yield unbiased estimates in a longitudinal setting.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Marginal Structural Models: unbiased estimation for longitudinal studiesInternational Journal of Public Health, 2010
- Estimation of dose–response functions for longitudinal data using the generalised propensity scoreStatistical Methods in Medical Research, 2010
- Causality2009
- A Longitudinal Study of Vaginal Douching and Bacterial Vaginosis--A Marginal Structural Modeling AnalysisAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2008
- Treatment Dose-Response in Amblyopia Therapy: The Monitored Occlusion Treatment of Amblyopia Study (MOTAS)Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 2004
- Marginal Structural Models for Analyzing Causal Effects of Time-dependent Treatments: An Application in Perinatal EpidemiologyAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2004
- Design of the Monitored Occlusion Treatment of Amblyopia Study (MOTAS)British Journal of Ophthalmology, 2002
- Causal Diagrams for Epidemiologic ResearchEpidemiology, 1999