Automatic control of tracheal tube cuff pressure in ventilated patients in semirecumbent position: A randomized trial*
Authors:
- Miquel FerrerMiquel Ferrer
- Ramon FarreRamon Farre
- Daniel NavajasDaniel Navajas
- Joan Ramon BadiaJBJoan Ramon Badia
- Josep Maria NicolasJNJosep Maria Nicolas
- Antoni TorresATAntoni Torres
- 1 June 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 35 (6) , 1543-1549
Abstract
The aspiration of subglottic secretions colonized by bacteria pooled around the tracheal tube cuff due to inadvertent deflation (<20 cm H2O) of the cuff plays a relevant role in the pathogenesis of ventilator-associated pneumonia. We assessed the efficacy of an automatic, validated device for the continuous regulation of tracheal tube cuff pressure in preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia. Prospective randomized controlled trial. Respiratory intensive care unit and general medical intensive care unit. One hundred and forty-two mechanically ventilated patients (age, 64 ± 17 yrs; Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, 18 ± 6) without pneumonia or aspiration at admission. Within 24 hrs of intubation, patients were randomly allocated to undergo continuous regulation of the cuff pressure with the automatic device (n = 73) or routine care of the cuff pressure (control group, n = 69). Patients remained in a semirecumbent position in bed. The primary end point variable was the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Main causes for intubation were decreased consciousness (43, 30%) and exacerbation of chronic respiratory diseases (38, 27%). Cuff pressure <20 cm H2O was more frequently observed in the control than the automatic group (45.3 vs. 0.7% determinations, p < .001). However, the rate of ventilator-associated pneumonia with clinical criteria (16, 22% vs. 20, 29%) and microbiological confirmation (11, 15% vs. 10, 15%), the distribution of early and late onset, the causative microorganisms, and intensive care unit (20, 27% vs. 16, 23%) and hospital mortality (30, 41% vs. 23, 33%) were similar for the automatic and control groups, respectively. Cuff pressure is better controlled with the automatic device. However, it did not result in additional benefits to the semirecumbent position in preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia.Keywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Fluid leakage past tracheal tube cuffs: evaluation of the new Microcuff endotracheal tubeIntensive Care Medicine, 2003
- Automatic regulation of the cuff pressure in endotracheally-intubated patientsEuropean Respiratory Journal, 2002
- The pathogenesis of ventilator-associated pneumonia: I. Mechanisms of bacterial transcolonization and airway inoculationIntensive Care Medicine, 1995
- A pressure regulator for the cuff of a tracheal tubeAnaesthesia, 1992
- Definitions for Sepsis and Organ Failure and Guidelines for the Use of Innovative Therapies in SepsisChest, 1992
- Prevention of nosocomial pneumonia in intubated patients: Respective role of mechanical subglottic secretions drainage and stress ulcer prophylaxisIntensive Care Medicine, 1992
- A Modified Epidural Syringe as an Endotracheal Tube Cuff Pressure-Controlling DeviceAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1990
- Prognosis in Acute Organ-System FailureAnnals of Surgery, 1985
- APACHE IICritical Care Medicine, 1985
- An Electropneumatic Instrument for Measuring and Controlling the Pressures in the Cuffs of Tracheal Tubes: ‘The Cardiff Cuff Controller’Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology, 1985