The changing landscape of practice patterns regarding unsedated endoscopy and propofol use: a national Web survey
Authors:
- Stacie VelaSVStacie Vela
- Ananya DasADAnanya Das
- Gregory CooperGCGregory Cooper
- Michael V. SivakMSMichael V. Sivak
- Gerard IsenbergGIGerard Isenberg
- Amitabh ChakACAmitabh Chak
- 1 July 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
- Vol. 62 (1) , 9-15
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Unsedated ultrathin EGD is well accepted when compared with conventional sedated EGD: a multicenter randomized trialGastroenterology, 2003
- The application of online surveys for workplace health researchPerspectives in Public Health, 2003
- Utility of Web-Based Assessment of Patient Satisfaction With EndoscopyAmerican Journal of Gastroenterology, 2003
- Gastroenterologist-administered propofol versus meperidine and midazolam for advanced upper endoscopy: A prospective, randomized trialGastroenterology, 2002
- Patient tolerance and acceptance of unsedated ultrathin esophagoscopyGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2002
- Prospective comparison of endoscopy patient satisfaction surveys: e-mail versus standard mail versus telephoneAmerican Journal of Gastroenterology, 2001
- Feasibility of colonoscopy screening: Discussion of issues and recommendations regarding implementationGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2001
- Sedation with propofol plus midazolam versus propofol alone for interventional endoscopic procedures: a prospective, randomized studyAlimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2000
- Patients willing to try colonoscopy without sedation: associated clinical factors and results of a randomized controlled trialGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1999
- PropofolDrugs, 1995