Spatial arrangement, density, and competition between barnyardgrass and tomato: I. Crop growth and yield
Authors:
- Robert F. NorrisRNRobert F. Norris
- Clyde L. ElmoreCEClyde L. Elmore
- Marcel RejmánekMRMarcel Rejmánek
- William C. AkeyWAWilliam C. Akey
- 1 January 2001
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Weed Science
- Vol. 49 (1) , 61-68
Abstract
Field studies were conducted to determine how the spatial arrangement of weed populations influences interspecific competition. We studied the influence of regular, random, and clumped distributions of barnyardgrass on growth and yield of direct-seeded tomato planted at different densities. Increasing aggregation increased intraspecific competition in barnyardgrass. At the same time, interspecific competition experienced by tomato from barnyardgrass decreased. Differences in the amount of shading of the tomato canopy by barnyardgrass contributed to yield loss differences for the various spatial arrangements. Clumped barnyardgrass caused significantly less average shading than barnyardgrass in regular or random arrangements. At a typical planting density of 10 tomato plants m−1 of row, yield losses ranged from 10 to 35% (1993) or 8 to 50% (1994) when competing with a clumped arrangement of barnyardgrass. At the same tomato density, yields were reduced from 20 to 50% (1993) or 11 to 75% (1994) for the regular and random arrangements for the same barnyardgrass densities. Predicted single-season economic threshold densities for barnyardgrass at a typical tomato planting density of 10 plants m−1 would be one barnyardgrass plant per 25, 19, or 15 m of crop row, respectively, for regular, random, and clumped spatial distributions.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Spatial arrangement, density, and competition between barnyardgrass and tomato: II. Barnyardgrass growth and seed productionWeed Science, 2001
- The influence of plant spacing on light interception and use in greenhouse tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.): A reviewScientia Horticulturae, 1997
- A simulation of herbicide use based on weed spatial distributionWeed Research, 1995
- Spatial Pattern Analysis of Weed Seeds in the Cultivated Soil Seed BankJournal of Applied Ecology, 1991
- The Effect of Weed Distribution on Predictions of Yield LossJournal of Applied Ecology, 1990
- Field‐scale estimates of grass weed populations in arable landWeed Research, 1988
- An empirical model relating crop yield to weed and crop density and a statistical comparison with other modelsThe Journal of Agricultural Science, 1985
- A simple model relating yield loss to weed densityAnnals of Applied Biology, 1985
- An alternative approach to the analysis of mixed cropping experiments. 1. Estimation of competition effects.Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science, 1983
- Competition between two annual herbs, Atriplex gmelini C.A. Mey and Chenopodium album L., in mixed cultures irrigated with seawater of various concentrationsOecologia, 1980