Closing the gap between science and management of cold‐water refuges in rivers and streams
Authors:
- Francine H. MejiaFMFrancine H. Mejia
- Valerie OuelletVOValerie Ouellet
- Martin A. BriggsMBMartin A. Briggs
- Stephanie M. CarlsonSCStephanie M. Carlson
- Roser Casas‐MuletRCRoser Casas‐Mulet
- Mollie ChapmanMCMollie Chapman
- Mathias J. CollinsMCMathias J. Collins
- Stephen J. DugdaleSDStephen J. Dugdale
- Joseph L. EbersoleJEJoseph L. Ebersole
- Danielle M. FrechetteDFDanielle M. Frechette
- Aimee H. FullertonAFAimee H. Fullerton
- Carole‐Anne GillisCGCarole‐Anne Gillis
Open Access
- 19 July 2023
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Global Change Biology
- Vol. 29 (19) , 5482-5508
Abstract
Human activities and climate change threaten coldwater organisms in freshwater ecosystems by causing rivers and streams to warm, increasing the intensity and frequency of warm temperature events, and reducing thermal heterogeneity. Cold‐water refuges are discrete patches of relatively cool water that are used by coldwater organisms for thermal relief and short‐term survival. Globally, cohesive management approaches are needed that consider interlinked physical, biological, and social factors of cold‐water refuges. We review current understanding of cold‐water refuges, identify gaps between science and management, and evaluate policies aimed at protecting thermally sensitive species. Existing policies include designating cold‐water habitats, restricting fishing during warm periods, and implementing threshold temperature standards or guidelines. However, these policies are rare and uncoordinated across spatial scales and often do not consider input from Indigenous peoples. We propose that cold‐water refuges be managed as distinct operational landscape units, which provide a social and ecological context that is relevant at the watershed scale. These operational landscape units provide the foundation for an integrated framework that links science and management by (1) mapping and characterizing cold‐water refuges to prioritize management and conservation actions, (2) leveraging existing and new policies, (3) improving coordination across jurisdictions, and (4) implementing adaptive management practices across scales. Our findings show that while there are many opportunities for scientific advancement, the current state of the sciences is sufficient to inform policy and management. Our proposed framework provides a path forward for managing and protecting cold‐water refuges using existing and new policies to protect coldwater organisms in the face of global change.Keywords
This publication has 109 references indexed in Scilit:
- Achieving Conservation Science that Bridges the Knowledge–Action BoundaryConservation Biology, 2013
- Stream isotherm shifts from climate change and implications for distributions of ectothermic organismsGlobal Change Biology, 2012
- Thermal biology and bioenergetics of different upriver migration strategies in a stock of summer-run Chinook salmonJournal of Thermal Biology, 2012
- DEVELOPMENT OF A STOCHASTIC WATER TEMPERATURE MODEL AND PROJECTION OF FUTURE WATER TEMPERATURE AND EXTREME EVENTS IN THE OUELLE RIVER BASIN IN QUÉBEC, CANADARiver Research and Applications, 2012
- Thermopeaking in Alpine streams: event characterization and time scalesEcohydrology, 2011
- Climate change and freshwater ecosystems: impacts across multiple levels of organizationPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2010
- Disease spread, susceptibility and infection intensity: vicious circles?Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2010
- Research in Thermal Biology: Burning Questions for Coldwater Stream FishesReviews in Fisheries Science, 2009
- Buffered, lagged, or cooled? Disentangling hyporheic influences on temperature cycles in stream channelsWater Resources Research, 2008
- Maximum Temperature Limits for Chinook, Coho, and Chum Salmon, and Steelhead Trout in the Pacific NorthwestReviews in Fisheries Science, 2005