Reliability and validity of commonly used patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
Authors:
- 1 December 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research
- Vol. 108 (8) , 103096
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- Responsiveness and Minimal Important Changes for the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score in Subjects Undergoing Rehabilitation After Total Knee ArthroplastyAmerican Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 2013
- Validation of the Korean Version of the Oxford Knee Score in Patients Undergoing Total Knee ArthroplastyClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2013
- Using the patient’s perspective to develop function short forms specific to total hip and knee replacement based on WOMAC function itemsThe Bone & Joint Journal, 2013
- The Oxford Knee Score: Compared performance before and after knee replacementOrthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research, 2012
- Análise de reprodutibilidade da escala "American Knee Society Score" (AKSS)Acta Ortopedica Brasileira, 2012
- The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2010
- The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi studyQuality of Life Research, 2010
- The use of the Oxford hip and knee scoresThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 2007
- Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after total knee replacementOsteoarthritis and Cartilage, 2007
- Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnairesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2007