Treatment With Helical Blade Cephalomedullary Nail for Two-Part Basicervical Proximal Femoral Fracture in Elderly Patients: A Retrospective Observational Study
Authors:
Open Access
- 28 November 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation
- Vol. 8 (4) , 244-251
Abstract
Background: Basicervical proximal femoral fracture is a known subtype of extracapsular fracture and is mechanically unstable, especially for the rotational direction, which may lead to implant failure. A cephalomedullary nail (CMN) is widely used for the fixation of unstable extracapsular fracture; however, its application for basicervical fracture remains controversial. Helical blade CMN is proven to have more rotational stability than traditional lag screw implants and potentially advantageous in the treatment of basicervical fracture. The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of helical blade CMN for basicervical fracture in elderly patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 500 consecutive extracapsular fracture patients treated surgically between January 2005 and February 2015. Patients who had trochanteric extension or multifragment fracture were excluded. Sixteen cases of 2-part basicervical proximal femoral fracture were identified. All patients were treated with the same single helical blade CMN system (DePuy Synthes PFNA-II). Implant-related complications were recorded. Results: Two patients dropped out during follow-up and 14 patients were included in the analysis. The average follow-up period was 21.9 months. No major complication was observed. The patients were subcategorized into 2 groups: nondisplaced (displacement <2 mm at any point of the fracture line) or displaced. Excessive telescoping was observed in 2 patients, both of whom were in the displaced fracture group. The overall implant-related complication rate was 14.2% (2/16). Conclusion: Internal fixation with the helical blade CMN system can be considered as a treatment option for 2-part basicervical proximal femoral fracture in elderly patients.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Inpatient cost for hip fracture patients managed with an orthogeriatric care model in SingaporeSingapore Medical Journal, 2017
- Cephalomedullary nail versus sliding hip screw for fixation of AO 31 A1/2 intertrochanteric femoral fracture: a 12-year comparison of failure, complications, and mortalityCurrent Orthopaedic Practice, 2016
- Outcomes of Low-Energy Basicervical Proximal Femoral Fractures Treated with Cephalomedullary FixationJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2016
- Retracted: Anatomy of the hip capsule and pericapsular structures: A cadaveric studyClinical Anatomy, 2015
- Should the tip-apex distance (TAD) rule be modified for the proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA)? A retrospective studyJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 2013
- The new proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA®) in daily practice: Results of a multicentre clinical studyInjury, 2008
- Surgical Treatment of Basicervical Fractures of Femur—A Prospective Evaluation of 269 PatientsJournal of Trauma: Injury, Infection & Critical Care, 2008
- Biomechanical characterisation of osteosyntheses for proximal femur fractures: helical blade versus screw.2008
- Basicervical Versus Intertrochanteric Fractures: An Analysis of Radiographic and Functional OutcomesOrthopedics, 2006
- Biomechanical Comparison of Internal Fixation Techniques for the Treatment of Unstable Basicervical Femoral Neck FracturesJournal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 1997