Network structure influences the strength of learned neural representations
Open Access
- 24 January 2025
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Communications
- Vol. 16 (1) , 1-19
Abstract
From sequences of discrete events, humans build mental models of their world. Referred to as graph learning, the process produces a model encoding the graph of event-to-event transition probabilities. Recent evidence suggests that some networks are easier to learn than others, but the neural underpinnings of this effect remain unknown. Here we use fMRI to show that even over short timescales the network structure of a temporal sequence of stimuli determines the fidelity of event representations as well as the dimensionality of the space in which those representations are encoded: when the graph was modular as opposed to lattice-like, BOLD representations in visual areas better predicted trial identity and displayed higher intrinsic dimensionality. Broadly, our study shows that network context influences the strength of learned neural representations, motivating future work in the design, optimization, and adaptation of network contexts for distinct types of learning.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 82 references indexed in Scilit:
- Humans can navigate complex graph structures acquired during latent learningCognition, 2022
- Gender Disparity in Citations in High-Impact Journal ArticlesJAMA Network Open, 2021
- Statistical learning of temporal community structure in the hippocampusHippocampus, 2015
- Statistical Learning2015
- Learning latent structure: carving nature at its jointsCurrent Opinion in Neurobiology, 2010
- Improved Optimization for the Robust and Accurate Linear Registration and Motion Correction of Brain ImagesNeuroImage, 2002
- Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA)Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2002
- Cortical Surface-Based AnalysisNeuroImage, 1999
- Software tools for analysis and visualization of fMRI dataNMR in Biomedicine, 1997
- Word Segmentation: The Role of Distributional CuesJournal of Memory and Language, 1996