Aid versus sanctions for taming oppressors: theory and case study of the Iraqi Kurds
Authors:
- 1 August 2004
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Defence and Peace Economics
- Vol. 15 (4) , 343-364
Abstract
We model an oppressor aiming at victimizing an excluded group in his country, with two main variants. A foreign power affects his behaviour using either conditional aid, subject to the dictator's participation constraint, or the threat of sanctions, broadly defined, subject to the credibility constraint. The choice between the two is either determined by the latter, or by their relative cost. Aid is preferred when the threat of sanctions is ineffective, and sanctions are too expensive. Sanctions might be imposed, if the threat is ineffective. A case study of the Iraqi Kurds after Iraq was subject to sanctions is presented.Aid, Sanctions, Threats, Oppressors, Credibility, Iraqi Kurds JEL: N40-N45-O19-P45,Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Instrument Choice and the Effectiveness of International Sanctions: A Simultaneous Equations ApproachJournal of Peace Research, 2003
- Contracting for aidJournal of Development Economics, 2003
- Who Gives Foreign Aid to Whom and Why?Journal of Economic Growth, 2000
- Aid, Taxation and Development in Sub‐Saharan AfricaEconomics & Politics, 1999
- Same Song, Same Refrain? Economic Sanctions in the 1990'sAmerican Economic Review, 1999
- Sanctions on South Africa: What Did They Do?American Economic Review, 1999
- Sanctions: Some Simple AnalyticsAmerican Economic Review, 1999
- Can repressive regimes be moderated through foreign aid?Public Choice, 1993
- A de factoKurdish state in Northern IraqThird World Quarterly, 1993
- SanctionsJournal of Political Economy, 1992