How did episiotomy rates change from 2007 to 2014? Population-based study in France
Open Access
- 4 June 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
- Vol. 18 (1) , 1-10
Abstract
Since the 2000s, selective episiotomy has been systematically recommended worldwide. In France, the recommended episiotomy rate in vaginal deliveries is less than 30%. The aims of this study were to describe the evolution of episiotomy rates between 2007 and 2014, especially for vaginal deliveries without instrumental assistance and to assess individual characteristics and birth environment factors associated with episiotomy. This population-based study included all hospital discharge abstracts for all deliveries in France from 2007 to 2014. The use of episiotomy in vaginal deliveries was identified by one code in the French Common Classification of Medical Procedures. The episiotomy rate per department and its evolution is described from 2007 to 2014. A mixed model was used to assess associations with episiotomy for non-operative vaginal deliveries and the risk factors related to the women’s characteristics and the birth environment. There were approximately 540,000 non-operative vaginal deliveries per year, in the study period. The national episiotomy rate for vaginal deliveries overall significantly decreased from 26.7% in 2007 to 19.9% in 2014. For non-operative deliveries, this rate fell from 21.1% to 14.1%. For the latter, the use of episiotomy was significantly associated with breech vaginal delivery (aOR = 1.27 [1.23–1.30]), epidural analgesia (aOR = 1.45 [1.43–1.47]), non-reassuring fetal heart rate (aOR = 1.47 [1.47–1.49]), and giving birth for the first time (aOR = 3.85 [3.84–4.00]). The episiotomy rate decreased throughout France, for vaginal deliveries overall and for non-operative vaginal deliveries. This decrease is probably due to proactive changes in practices to restrict the number of episiotomies, which should be performed only if beneficial to the mother and the infant.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Données 2007 de l’extraction instrumentale en France : résultats d’une enquête nationale auprès de l’ensemble des centres hospitalo-universitairesJournal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction, 2010
- A prospective cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of episiotomy at operative vaginal deliveryBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2008
- Evidence-based labor and delivery managementAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2008
- A Behavioral Intervention to Improve Obstetrical CareNew England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- Episiotomy Rates Around the World: An UpdateBirth, 2005
- Decreased anal sphincter lacerations associated with restrictive episiotomy useAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2005
- Episiotomy and perineal tears presumed to be imminent: randomized controlled trialActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 2004
- Methods and consequences of changes in use of episiotomyBMJ, 1994
- Routine vs selective episiotomy: a randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 1993
- Benefits and Risks of EpisiotomyObstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 1983