Diagnostic Performance of BUU-Customized Whole-Exome Sequencing for Suspicious Thyroid Nodules: A Prospective Diagnostic Accuracy Study
Open Access
- 1 October 2026
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery
- Vol. 55
Abstract
Importance: Suspicious thyroid nodules often prompt avoidable surgeries due to diagnostic uncertainty. Although commercial next-generation sequencing assays improve risk stratification, evidence for locally developed sequencing pipelines remains limited. Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of Burapha University-customized whole-exome sequencing (BUU-WES) using preoperative ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy (CNB) specimens, with postsurgical histopathology as the reference standard. Design: Multicenter prospective diagnostic accuracy study. Setting: Four tertiary-care hospitals in Thailand. Participants: Adults (≥20 years) undergoing thyroid surgery for nodules suspicious on ultrasonography (American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System 4-5) and/or cytology (Bethesda I-V). Intervention: DNA extracted from CNB specimens underwent BUU-WES; variants were interpreted using curated databases and published evidence. Main Outcome and Measures: Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and overall accuracy with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Among 82 participants (82 index nodules), malignancy prevalence was 25.6% (21/82). BUU-WES demonstrated sensitivity of 57.1% (95% CI, 34.0%-78.2%), specificity of 86.9% (95% CI, 75.8%-94.2%), PPV of 60.0% (95% CI, 36.1%-80.9%), and NPV of 85.5% (95% CI, 74.2%-93.1%). In nodules ≥1 cm (n = 71), sensitivity increased to 83.3% (95% CI, 51.6%-97.9%), specificity 89.8% (79.2%-96.2%), with NPV 96.4% (95% CI, 87.5%-99.6%). In indeterminate cytology (Bethesda III/IV), BUU-WES showed moderate diagnostic performance, with sensitivity of 60% and specificity and NPV of 86.4%. The most frequently detected alterations involved BRAF , NRAS , and KRAS . Conclusions: BUU-WES primarily functions as a rule-in test due to its high specificity. Its most clinically relevant application is in indeterminate thyroid nodules (Bethesda III/IV), where it serves as an adjunctive tool for risk stratification. Within this subgroup, diagnostic performance is further optimized in nodules ≥1 cm, where the improved NPV suggests potential rule-out applicability in appropriately selected patients.Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Performance of a Multigene Genomic Classifier in Thyroid Nodules With Indeterminate CytologyJAMA Oncology, 2019
- ACR Thyroid Imaging, Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS): White Paper of the ACR TI-RADS CommitteeJournal of the American College of Radiology, 2017
- Standards and Guidelines for the Interpretation and Reporting of Sequence Variants in CancerThe Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, 2017
- AJCC Cancer Staging Manual2017
- Genetic alterations of differentiated thyroid carcinoma in iodine‐rich and iodine‐deficient countriesCancer Medicine, 2016
- TERT Promoter Mutations in Thyroid CancerDiscover Oncology, 2016
- Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular PathologyGenetics in Medicine, 2015
- Sequencing technologies — the next generationNature Reviews Genetics, 2009
- Sensitive mutation detection in heterogeneous cancer specimens by massively parallel picoliter reactor sequencingNature Medicine, 2006
- Different ras gene mutational frequencies in thyroid papillary carcinomas in Japan and ThailandCancer Letters, 1998