Artificial Intelligence and the Production of Judicial Truth
- 13 September 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Theory, Culture & Society
- Vol. 42 (1) , 3-18
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to present artificial intelligence (AI) as an organ with a role in the production of judicial truth, expanding its objects, changing its procedures and reshaping the distribution of agencies within the judicial organism. To this end, it builds on Michel Foucault’s work on the procedures of truth production and the three subject forms involved: operator, spectator and object. This is then complemented by the general organological perspective proposed by Bernard Stiegler. On the basis of both, we will demonstrate two realities: first, that AI is shifting truth production from the individual to the profile, and second, that the types of associations that AI is forming have the potential to curtail human agency in the production of judicial truth.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- On phantom publics, clusters, and collectives: be(com)ing subject in algorithmic timesAI & SOCIETY, 2023
- The Nooscope manifested: AI as instrument of knowledge extractivismAI & SOCIETY, 2020
- Deep Learning Algorithm for Judicial Judgment Prediction Based on BERT2020
- An Artificial-Intelligence-Based Semantic Assist Framework for Judicial TrialsAsian Journal of Law and Society, 2020
- A Neural-Network-Based Model of Charge Prediction via the Judicial Interpretation of CrimesIEEE Access, 2020
- Law Article Prediction Based on Deep Learning2019
- Evaluation of Judicial Imprisonment Term Prediction Model Based on Text Mutation2019
- PTM: A Topic Model for the Inferring of the PenaltyJournal of Computer Science and Technology, 2018
- From Big Law to Lean LawInternational Review of Law and Economics, 2014
- Scaling Politically Meaningful Dimensions Using Texts and VotesAmerican Journal of Political Science, 2014