Comparative Assessment of Cement and Geopolymer Immobilization Approaches: Short-Term Leaching Performance of Thermally Treated Ion Exchange Resin Waste Forms
Authors:
- Raúl FernándezRaúl Fernández
- Pedro Perez-CortesPPPedro Perez-Cortes
- Esther Irene MarugánEMEsther Irene Marugán
- Pilar Padilla-EncinasPPPilar Padilla-Encinas
- Francisca PuertasFrancisca Puertas
- Inés García-LodeiroIGInés García-Lodeiro
- Ana Isabel RuizAna Isabel Ruiz
- Jaime Fernando CuevasJaime Fernando Cuevas
- María Jesús TurreroMTMaría Jesús Turrero
- María Cruz AlonsoMAMaría Cruz Alonso
- Elena TorresETElena Torres
Open Access
- 19 October 2025
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Applied Sciences
- Vol. 15 (20) , 11196
Abstract
Cementation using Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) remains the standard method for conditioning low- and intermediate-level radioactive waste, including Spent Ion Exchange Resins (SIERs). This work presents an integrated strategy involving thermal pretreatment to minimize waste volume and eliminate organic constituents, followed by encapsulation within three distinct binders: CEM I, CEM III, and a novel one-part geopolymer. The one-part geopolymer system represents a significant operational innovation, enabling safe and simple “just-add-water” processing and avoiding the need to handle alkaline solutions. The proposed geopolymer, synthesized from metakaolin, blast furnace slag, and solid sodium silicate, was systematically benchmarked against conventional OPC matrices (CEM I, CEM III) by assessing their capacity to immobilize thermally treated SIER ashes under accelerated leaching conditions. For benchmarking, leaching indices for Cs and Sr were determined following the ANSI/ANS 16.9 standard protocol in three representative environments simulating operational and long-term repository scenarios, providing a quantitative evaluation of radionuclide retention and matrix durability. Results indicate that the one-part geopolymer improved leaching indices for Cs and Sr compared to both cementitious binders and complied with regulatory waste acceptance criteria. The comparative results highlight the potential of geopolymer technology to increase waste loading efficiencies and improve long-term safety, establishing a robust framework for future radioactive waste management approaches.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Geopolymers in nuclear waste storage and immobilization: mechanisms, applications, and challengesDiscover Applied Sciences, 2025
- Recent advances in immobilization of radioactive cesium and strontium-bearing wastes in alkali activated materials – A reviewJournal of Environmental Management, 2024
- “Effect of incorporating a molten salt waste from nuclear power plants on the properties of geopolymers and Portland cement wasteforms”Cement and Concrete Composites, 2023
- Comparison of One-Part and Two-Part Alkali-Activated Metakaolin and Blast Furnace SlagJournal of Sustainable Metallurgy, 2022
- Geopolymer technology for the solidification of simulated ion exchange resins with radionuclidesJournal of Environmental Management, 2019
- One-part alkali-activated materials: A reviewCement and Concrete Research, 2018
- Re-use of waste glass in improving properties of metakaolin-based geopolymers: Mechanical and microstructure examinationsConstruction and Building Materials, 2017
- Cs+and Sr2+adsorption selectivity of zeolites in relation to radioactive decontaminationJournal of Asian Ceramic Societies, 2015
- Ion exchange in amorphous alkali-activated aluminosilicates: Potassium based geopolymersApplied Clay Science, 2014
- Effects of porosity on leaching of Ca from hardened ordinary Portland cement pasteCement and Concrete Research, 2005