Sitting, Standing, and Physical Activity in Australian Passenger Rail Drivers: On the Right Track for Better Health?
Open Access
- 1 January 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Human Kinetics in Journal of Physical Activity and Health
- Vol. 21 (11) , 1188-1196
Abstract
Background: Poor health in passenger rail drivers, resulting from perceived highly sedentary work and leisure time, has implications for public safety. To date, no studies have described the physical behaviors of passenger rail drivers. This study aimed to characterize the physical behaviors of passenger rail drivers by investigating the volume, pattern, variation, and composition of behaviors at and outside of work. Methods: A convenience sample of 31 rail drivers (77% male, median age 51.0 [12.5] y) in South Australia wore an activity monitor on their right thigh for 8 days and completed a work logbook. Physical behaviors (sitting, standing, light-intensity physical activity, moderate- to vigorous-intensity physical activity [MVPA], and steps) were recorded for workdays and nonworkdays, and work and nonwork time on workdays. The volume, bouts, between-participants variation, and 3-way composition were compared across the 4 time periods. Results: Drivers sat for 10.6 (1.5) hours, did 76.3 (38.8) minutes of MVPA, and took 9727.3 (4088.4) steps daily. At work, drivers were sitting 369.3 (41.8) minutes (187.1 [54.2] min in prolonged bouts) and doing MVPA 31.7 (10.0) minutes. Between-participants variation in sitting time during work (11%) was lower than both nonwork on a workday (19%) and on a nonworkday (24%; P < .001). Compositions at work differed from nonwork on workdays (F = 27.7, P < .001), as did compositions on workdays compared with nonworkdays (F = 6.8, P = .002). Conclusions: Passenger rail drivers were highly sedentary, but also surprisingly active. At work, drivers were more sedentary and had lower variation in behaviors, suggesting work constraints play an important role. Therefore, work may be the most appropriate domain to intervene for promoting healthy physical behavior profiles among these passenger rail drivers.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- ‘Just Right’ job design: A conceptual framework for sustainable work in rail driving using the Goldilocks Work ParadigmApplied Ergonomics, 2022
- Can occupational health professionals successfully apply the Goldilocks Work Paradigm in a simulated work redesign?Ergonomics, 2022
- Ghost trains: Australian rail in the early stages of the global COVID‐19 pandemicHuman Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 2021
- Bidirectional associations between emergency nurses’ occupational and leisure physical activity: An observational studyJournal of Sports Sciences, 2020
- The workforce ageing challenge and employer response: a study of the Australian transport and logistics industryLabour and Industry, 2019
- Sitting Time, Physical Activity, and Risk of Mortality in AdultsJACC, 2019
- Does total volume of physical activity matter more than pattern for onset of CVD? A prospective cohort study of older British menInternational Journal of Cardiology, 2019
- “Tell them what they want to hear and get back to work”: Insights into the utility of current occupational health assessments from the perspectives of train driversTransportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2018
- Does physical activity attenuate, or even eliminate, the detrimental association of sitting time with mortality? A harmonised meta-analysis of data from more than 1 million men and womenThe Lancet, 2016
- Recovering Time or Chasing Rainbows? Exploring Time Perception, Conceptualization of Time Recovery, and Time Pressure Mitigation in Train DrivingIIE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors, 2015