Microbial colonization in the partially exposed nonabsorbable membrane during alveolar ridge preservation
Authors:
- Silvia Helena Garcia BrazSBSilvia Helena Garcia Braz
- Mabelle Freitas MonteiroMMMabelle Freitas Monteiro
- Edson Ken MatumotoEMEdson Ken Matumoto
- Mônica Grazieli CorrêaMCMônica Grazieli Corrêa
- Renato Corrêa Viana CasarinRCRenato Corrêa Viana Casarin
- Fernanda Vieira RibeiroFRFernanda Vieira Ribeiro
- Fabiano Ribeiro CiranoFCFabiano Ribeiro Cirano
- Marcio Zaffalon CasatiMCMarcio Zaffalon Casati
- Suzana Peres PimentelSPSuzana Peres Pimentel
- 14 June 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Clinical Oral Investigations
- Vol. 28 (7) , 1-10
Abstract
Aim This study evaluated the impact of the partial exposition of the nonabsorbable membrane (dPTFE) on microbial colonization during bone healing. Materials and Methods Patients indicated for tooth extraction were randomized to dPTFE group (n = 22) - tooth extraction and alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) using an intentionally exposed dPTFE membrane and USH group (n = 22) - tooth extraction and unassisted socket healing. Biofilm samples were collected at the barrier in the dPTFE and on the natural healing site in the USH after 3 and 28 days. Samples from the inner surface of the dPTFE barrier were also collected (n = 13). The microbiome was evaluated using the Illumina MiSeq system. Results Beta diversity was different from 3 to 28 days in both groups, and at 28 days, different microbial communities were identified between therapies. The dPTFE was characterized by a higher prevalence and abundance of gram-negative and anaerobic species than USH. Furthermore, the inner surface of the dPTFE membrane was colonized by a different community than the one observed on the outer surface. Conclusion Intentionally exposed dPTFE membrane modulates microbial colonization in the ARP site, creating a more homogeneous and anaerobic community on the inner and outer surfaces of the membrane. Clinical relevance DPTFE promoted faster biofilm colonization and enrichment of gram-negative and anaerobes close to the regenerated site in the membrane’s inner and outer surfaces. dPTFE membrane can be used exposed to the oral site, but approaches for biofilm control should still be considered. The study was retrospectively registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04329351).Keywords
Funding Information
- Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (2017/19834-0)
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Oral multispecies biofilm development and the key role of cell–cell distanceNature Reviews Microbiology, 2010
- Guided Bone Regeneration Using Nonexpanded Polytetrafluoroethylene Membranes in Preparation for Dental Implant Placements—A Report of 420 CasesImplant Dentistry, 2010
- Comparison of Dermal Matrix and Polytetrafluoroethylene Membrane for Socket Bone Augmentation: A Clinical and Histologic StudyJournal of Periodontology, 2009
- Alveolar Bone Preservation in Extraction Sockets Using Non‐Resorbable dPTFE Membranes: A Retrospective Non‐Randomized StudyJournal of Periodontology, 2008
- The Effect of Chlorhexidine Mouthrinses on Early Bacterial Colonization of Guided Tissue Regeneration Membranes. An In Vivo StudyJournal of Periodontology, 2000
- Adherence of periodontopathic bacteria to bioabsorbable and non‐absorbable barrier membranes in vitroClinical Oral Implants Research, 1999
- Evaluation of a new polytetrafluoroethylene guided tissue regeneration membrane in healing extraction sites.1998
- Bacterial Colonization of Bioabsorbable Barrier Material and Periodontal RegenerationJournal of Periodontology, 1996
- High-density PTFE membranes: uses with root-form implants.1996
- THE USE OF HIGH-DENSITY POLYTETRAFLUOROETHYLENE MEMBRANE TO TREAT OSSEOUS DEFECTSImplant Dentistry, 1995