Strategies addressing the limitations of cross-sectional designs in occupational health psychology: What they are good for (and what not)
Authors:
Top Cited Papers
- 2 January 2021
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Work & Stress
- Vol. 35 (1) , 1-5
Abstract
Like many researchers in other areas of the social and behavioural sciences, scholars in occupational health psychology (OHP) often rely on cross-sectional survey designs when addressing the issues...Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- A primer on two-level dynamic structural equation models for intensive longitudinal data in Mplus.Psychological Methods, 2020
- Occupational self-efficacy and work engagement as moderators in the stressor-detachment modelWork & Stress, 2020
- The impact of workaholism on day-level workload and emotional exhaustion, and on longer-term job performanceWork & Stress, 2020
- What about me? The impact of employee change agents’ person-role fit on their job satisfaction during organisational changeWork & Stress, 2020
- Experience Sampling Methods: A Discussion of Critical Trends and Considerations for Scholarly AdvancementOrganizational Research Methods, 2018
- Longitudinal Research: A Panel Discussion on Conceptual Issues, Research Design, and Statistical TechniquesWork, Aging and Retirement, 2016
- Longitudinal Research: The Theory, Design, and Analysis of ChangeJournal of Management, 2009
- Diary Methods: Capturing Life as it is LivedAnnual Review of Psychology, 2003
- Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003
- A Primer in Longitudinal Data Analysis2000