Electromyographic Monitoring and Its Anatomical Implications in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery
Authors:
- Juan S. UribeJUJuan S. Uribe
- Fernando L. ValeFVFernando L. Vale
- Elias DakwarEDElias Dakwar
- 1 December 2010
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Spine
- Vol. 35 (Supplement) , S368-S374
Abstract
Literature review. The objective of this article is to examine current intraoperative electromyography (EMG) neurophysiologic monitoring methods and their application in minimally invasive techniques. We will also discuss the recent application of EMG and its anatomic implications to the minimally invasive lateral transpsoas approach to the spine. Minimally invasive techniques require that the same goals of surgery be achieved, with the hope of decreased morbidity to the patient. Unlike standard open procedures, direct visualization of the anatomy is decreased. To increase the safety of minimally invasive spine surgery, neurophysiological monitoring techniques have been developed. Review of the literature was performed using the National Center for Biotechnology Information databases using PUBMED/MEDLINE. All articles in the English language discussing the use of intraoperative EMG monitoring and minimally invasive spine surgery were reviewed. The role of EMG monitoring in special reference to the minimally invasive lateral transpsoas approach is also described. In total, 76 articles were identified that discussed the role of neuromonitoring in spine surgery. The majority of articles on EMG and spine surgery discuss the use of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IOM) for safe and accurate pedicle screw placement. In general, there is a paucity of literature that pertains to intraoperative EMG neuromonitoring and minimally invasive spine surgery. Recently, EMG has been used during minimally invasive lateral transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine for interbody fusion. The addition of EMG to the lateral approach has contributed to decrease the complication rate from 30% to less than 1%. In minimally invasive approaches to the spine, the use of EMG IOM might provide additional safety, such as percutaneous pedicle screw placement, where visualization is limited compared with conventional open procedures. In addition to knowledge of the anatomy and image guidance, directional EMG IOM is crucial for safe passage through the psoas muscle during the minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal approach.Keywords
This publication has 66 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Evidence for Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring in Spine SurgerySpine, 2010
- Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spine surgery: a reviewNeurosurgical Focus, 2009
- Prevention, identification, and treatment of perioperative spinal cord injuryNeurosurgical Focus, 2008
- Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring of the spinal cord during spinal cord and spine surgery: A review focus on the corticospinal tractsClinical Neurophysiology, 2008
- Basic methodological principles of multimodal intraoperative monitoring during spine surgeriesEuropean Spine Journal, 2007
- Multimodal intraoperative monitoring: towards a routine use in surgical treatment of severe spinal disordersEuropean Spine Journal, 2007
- The Role of Intraoperative Neurophysiology in the Protection or Documentation of Surgically Induced Injury to the Spinal CordAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2001
- Evoked and Spontaneous Electromyography to Evaluate Lumbosacral Pedicle Screw PlacementSpine, 1996
- A Prospective Analysis of Intraoperative Electromyographic Monitoring of Pedicle Screw Placement With Computed Tomographic Scan ConfirmationSpine, 1995
- Intraoperative Evoked EMG Monitoring in an Animal ModelSpine, 1992