The Effect of Implant Density on Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Fusion
Authors:
- A. Noelle LarsonALA. Noelle Larson
- David W. PollyDPDavid W. Polly
- Michael P. KellyMKMichael P. Kelly
- B. Stephens RichardsBRB. Stephens Richards
- Sumeet GargSGSumeet Garg
- Stefan ParentSPStefan Parent
- Stuart L. WeinsteinSWStuart L. Weinstein
- Charles H. CrawfordCCCharles H. Crawford
- James O. SandersJSJames O. Sanders
- Laurel C. BlakemoreLBLaurel C. Blakemore
- 16 November 2023
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
- Vol. 106 (3) , 180-189
Abstract
Background: Severe adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) can be treated with instrumented fusion, but the number of anchors needed for optimal correction is controversial. Methods: We conducted a multicenter, randomized study that included patients undergoing spinal fusion for single thoracic curves between 45° and 65°, the most common form of operatively treated AIS. Of the 211 patients randomized, 108 were assigned to a high-density screw pattern and 103, to a low-density screw pattern. Surgeons were instructed to use ≥1.8 implants per spinal level fused for patients in the high-implant-density group or ≤1.4 implants per spinal level fused for patients in the low-implant-density group. The primary outcome measure was the percent correction of the coronal curve at the 2-year follow-up. The power analysis for this trial required 174 patients to show equivalence, defined as a 95% confidence interval (CI) within a ±10% correction margin with a probability of 90%. Results: In the intention-to-treat analysis, the mean percent correction of the coronal curve was equivalent between the high-density and low-density groups at the 2-year follow-up (67.6% versus 65.7%; difference, −1.9% [95% CI: −6.1%, 2.2%]). In the per-protocol cohorts, the mean percent correction of the coronal curve was also equivalent between the 2 groups at the 2-year follow-up (65.0% versus 66.1%; difference, 1.1% [95% CI: −3.0%, 5.2%]). A total of 6 patients in the low-density group and 5 patients in the high-density group required reoperation (p = 1.0). Conclusions: In the setting of spinal fusion for primary thoracic AIS curves between 45° and 65°, the percent coronal curve correction obtained with use of a low-implant-density construct and that obtained with use of a high-implant-density construct were equivalent. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Computed Tomography–Guided Navigation of Thoracic Pedicle Screws for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Results in More Accurate Placement and Less Screw RemovalSpine, 2012
- Right adolescent idiopathic thoracic curve (Lenke 1 A and B): does cost of instrumentation and implant density improve radiographic and cosmetic parameters?European Spine Journal, 2011
- Complications of Pedicle Screw Fixation in Scoliosis SurgerySpine, 2010
- Correlation of Scoliosis Curve Correction With the Number and Type of Fixation AnchorsSpine, 2009
- Evaluation of thoracic pedicle screw placement in adolescent idiopathic scoliosisEuropean Spine Journal, 2009
- Coronal and Sagittal Plane Correction in Patients With Lenke 1 Adolescent Idiopathic ScoliosisJournal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques, 2009
- Posterior fusion only for thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis of more than 80°: pedicle screws versus hybrid instrumentationEuropean Spine Journal, 2008
- Rationale Behind the Current State-of-the-Art Treatment of Scoliosis (in the Pedicle Screw Era)Spine, 2008
- Pulmonary function in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a 25 year follow up after surgery or start of brace treatmentThorax, 2001
- Segmental Pedicle Screw Fixation in the Treatment of Thoracic Idiopathic ScoliosisSpine, 1995