Predictive validity of the Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths & Injuries (STEADI) program fall risk screening algorithms among community-dwelling Thai elderly
Open Access
- 14 March 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Medicine
- Vol. 20 (1) , 1-13
Abstract
Background: Fall risk screening using multiple methods was strongly advised as the initial step for preventing fall. Currently, there is only one such tool which was proposed by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for use in its Stopping Elderly Accidents, Death & Injuries (STEADI) program. Its predictive validity outside the US context, however, has never been investigated. The purpose of this study was to determine the predictive validity (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: AUC), sensitivity, and specificity of the two-step sequential fall-risk screening algorithm of the STEADI program for Thai elderly in the community. Methods: A 1-year prospective cohort study was conducted during October 2018–December 2019. Study population consisted of 480 individuals aged 65 years or older living in Nakhon Ratchasima Province, Thailand. The fall risk screening algorithm composed of two serial steps. Step 1 is a screening by the clinician’s 3 key questions or the Thai Stay Independent brochure (Thai-SIB) 12 questions. Step 2 is a screening by 3 physical fitness testing tools including Time Up and Go test (TUG), 30-s Chair Stand, and 4-stage balance test. Participants were then followed for their fall incidents. Statistical analyses were conducted by using Cox proportional hazard model. The AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and other relevant predictive validity indices were then estimated. Results: The average age of the participants was 73.3 ± 6.51 years (range 65–95 years), and 52.5% of them were female. The screening based on the clinician’s 3 key questions in Step 1 had a high AUC (0.845), with the sensitivity and specificity of 93.9% (95% CI 88.8, 92.7) and 75.0% (95% CI 70.0, 79.6), respectively. Appropriate risk categorization however differed slightly from the original STEADI program. Conclusions: With some modification, the fall risk screening algorithm based on the STEADI program was applicable in Thai context.Keywords
Funding Information
- Ratchadapiseksompotch Fund, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, fiscal year 2019 (RA62/024)
- THE 90th ANNIVERSARY OF CHULALONGKORN UNIVERSITY FUND (GCUGR1125622041D)
- Department of Health Government Development Fund, fiscal year 2015
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Development and Evaluation of an Online Fall-Risk Questionnaire for Nonfrail Community-Dwelling Elderly Persons: A Pilot StudyCurrent Gerontology and Geriatrics Research, 2016
- Assessment and Management of Fall Risk in Primary Care SettingsMedical Clinics of North America, 2015
- Sample size estimation in diagnostic test studies of biomedical informaticsJournal of Biomedical Informatics, 2014
- Interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the communityCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2012
- Validating an evidence-based, self-rated fall risk questionnaire (FRQ) for older adultsJournal of Safety Research, 2011
- Summary of the Updated American Geriatrics Society/British Geriatrics Society Clinical Practice Guideline for Prevention of Falls in Older PersonsJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2011
- Differentiating fall-prone and healthy adults using local dynamic stabilityErgonomics, 2008
- Psychometric Comparisons of the Timed Up and Go, One‐Leg Stand, Functional Reach, and Tinetti Balance Measures in Community‐Dwelling Older PeopleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2004
- Guideline for the Prevention of Falls in Older PersonsJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2001
- The Timed “Up & Go”: A Test of Basic Functional Mobility for Frail Elderly PersonsJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 1991