Resource Allocation by Measures of Relative Social Need in Geographical Areas: The Relevance of the Signed χ2, the Percentage, and the Raw Count
Author:
- 1 March 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space
- Vol. 28 (3) , 537-554
Abstract
The construction of social indices to compare local areas from census and other data has an important influence on the allocation of public resources. There has been debate in past years on the choice of variables for such indices and on the means used to combine percentages measured for more than one variable. More recently the percentage and its z-score have given way to the signed χ2 statistic as a more appropriate means of identifying concentrations of need. In this paper the relative merits of the signed χ2 statistic, the percentage, and the raw count are discussed in relation to two separate objectives in resource allocation: identification of concentrations of need (geographic targeting) and calculation of local budgets (resource distribution). The signed χ2 statistic is shown to overcome disadvantages of the percentage when identifying high concentrations of need but entails its own disadvantages. It is arbitrary in its construction, its ranking of areas is dependent on the choice of a reference area, and it is misleading for areas of low concentration of need. These conclusions apply both to comparison of large local areas such as local authority districts and to comparison of small areas within a locality. Alternatives are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Is it Cash that the Deprived are Short of?Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 1997
- Constructing an Urban Deprivation Index: A Way of Meeting the Need for FlexibilityEnvironment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 1995
- On Measures of Deprivation and the Spatial Allocation of Resources for Primary Health CareEnvironment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 1994
- The English Standard Spending Assessment System: An Assessment of the MethodologyEnvironment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 1994
- The Standard Spending Assessment as a Measure of Spending Needs in Nonmetropolitan DistrictsEnvironment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 1994
- Editorial: Changes in Local Government FinanceJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 1993
- Deprivation Payments to GPs: Not What the Doctor OrderedEnvironment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 1991
- The Analysis of Small Area Statistics and Planning for HealthJournal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician), 1985