Application of AutoFom III equipment for prediction of primal and commercial cut weight of Korean pig carcasses
Authors:
Open Access
- 1 October 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies in Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences
- Vol. 31 (10) , 1670-1676
Abstract
This study was conducted to enable on-line prediction of primal and commercial cut weights in Korean slaughter pigs by AutoFom III, which non-invasively scans pig carcasses early after slaughter using ultrasonic sensors. A total of 162 Landrace, Yorkshire, and Duroc (LYD) pigs and 154 LYD pigs representing the yearly Korean slaughter distribution were included in the calibration and validation dataset, respectively. Partial least squares (PLS) models were developed for prediction of the weight of deboned shoulder blade, shoulder picnic, belly, loin, and ham. In addition, AutoFom III´s ability to predict the weight of the commercial cuts of spare rib, jowl, false lean, back rib, diaphragm, and tenderloin was investigated. Each cut was manually prepared by local butchers and then recorded. The cross-validated prediction accuracy (R2cv) of the calibration models for deboned shoulder blade, shoulder picnic, loin, belly, and ham ranged from 0.77 to 0.86. The R2cv for tenderloin, spare rib, diaphragm, false lean, jowl, and back rib ranged from 0.34 to 0.62. Because the R2cv of the latter commercial cuts were less than 0.65, AutoFom III was less accurate for the prediction of those cuts. The root mean squares error of cross validation calibration (RMSECV) model was comparable to the root mean squares error of prediction (RMSEP), although the RMSECV was numerically higher than RMSEP for the deboned shoulder blade and belly. AutoFom III predicts the weight of deboned shoulder blade, shoulder picnic, loin, belly, and ham with high accuracy, and is a suitable process analytical tool for sorting pork primals in Korea. However, AutoFom III's prediction of smaller commercial Korean cuts is less accurate, which may be attributed to the lack of anatomical reference points and the lack of a good correlation between the scanned area of the carcass and those traits.Keywords
Funding Information
- Dodram Pig Farmers Cooperative
- National Research Foundation of Korea
- Ministry of Education (2009-0093813)
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Non-invasive methods for the determination of body and carcass composition in livestock: dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound: invited reviewAnimal, 2015
- Consumer preference, behavior and perception about meat and meat products: An overviewMeat Science, 2014
- A new simple method for estimating the pork carcass mass of primal cuts and lean meat content of the carcassAnimal Production Science, 2014
- Ultrasound as a Modern Tool for Carcass Evaluation and Meat Processing: A ReviewInternational Journal of Meat Science, 2011
- Prediction of pork belly fatness from the intact primal cutFood Control, 2010
- Comparison of different devices for predicting the lean meat percentage of pig carcassesMeat Science, 2009
- Estimation of lean meat content in pig carcasses using X-ray Computed Tomography and PLS regressionChemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 2009
- The estimated accuracy of the EU reference dissection method for pig carcass classificationMeat Science, 2006
- Evaluation of three ultrasound instruments, CVT-2, UltraFom 300 and AutoFom for predicting salable meat yield and weight of lean in the primals of pork carcassesMeat Science, 2004
- Comparison of different methods for determination of drip loss and their relationships to meat quality and carcass characteristics in pigsMeat Science, 2004