Cost effectiveness of a GP delivered medication review to reduce polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate prescribing in older patients with multimorbidity in Irish primary care: the SPPiRE cluster randomised controlled trial
Authors:
- Paddy GillespiePGPaddy Gillespie
- for the SPPiRE Study teamFTfor the SPPiRE Study team
Open Access
- 27 August 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in The European Journal of Health Economics
- Vol. 26 (3) , 427-454
Abstract
Background: Evidence on the cost effectiveness of deprescribing in multimorbidity is limited. Objective: To investigate the cost effectiveness of a general practitioner (GP) delivered, individualised medication review to reduce polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate prescribing in older patients with multimorbidity in Irish primary care. Methods: Within trial economic evaluation, from a healthcare perspective and based on a cluster randomised controlled trial with a 6 month follow up and 403 patients (208 Intervention and 195 Control) recruited between April 2017 and December 2019. Intervention GPs used the SPPiRE website which contained educational materials and a template to support a web-based individualised medication review. Control GPs delivered usual care. Incremental costs, quality adjusted life years (QALYs) generated using the EQ-5D-5L instrument, and expected cost effectiveness were estimated using multilevel modelling and multiple imputation techniques. Uncertainty was explored using parametric, deterministic and probabilistic methods. Results: On average, the SPPiRE intervention was dominant over usual care, with non-statistically significant mean cost savings of €410 (95% confidence interval (CI): − 2211, 1409) and mean health gains of 0.014 QALYs (95% CI − 0.011, 0.039). At cost effectiveness threshold values of €20,000 and €45,000 per QALY, the probability of SPPiRE being cost effective was 0.993 and 0.988. Results were sensitive to missing data and data collection period. Conclusions: The study observed a pattern towards dominance for the SPPiRE intervention, with high expected cost effectiveness. Notably, observed differences in costs and outcomes were consistent with chance, and missing data and related uncertainty was non trivial. The cost effectiveness evidence may be considered promising but equivocal. Trial registration: ISRCTN: 12752680, 20th October 2016.Keywords
Funding Information
- Health Research Board (CTN-2021-002)
- National University Ireland, Galway
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- High risk prescribing in primary care patients particularly vulnerable to adverse drug events: cross sectional population database analysis in Scottish general practiceBMJ, 2011
- Hospital Admissions Associated with Adverse Drug Reactions: A Systematic Review of Prospective Observational StudiesAnnals of Pharmacotherapy, 2008
- Appropriate prescribing in elderly people: how well can it be measured and optimised?The Lancet, 2007
- Using the net benefit regression framework to construct cost-effectiveness acceptability curves: an example using data from a trial of external loop recorders versus Holter monitoring for ambulatory monitoring of "community acquired" syncopeBMC Health Services Research, 2006
- Addressing the issues that arise in analysing multicentre cost data, with application to a multinational studyJournal of Health Economics, 2006
- Multimorbidity and quality of life in primary care: a systematic reviewHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2004
- Cost‐effectiveness acceptability curves – facts, fallacies and frequently asked questionsHealth Economics, 2004
- CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trialsBMJ, 2004
- A BAYESIAN APPROACH TO STOCHASTIC COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSISInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2001
- Measuring the Quality of Well-Being in Cystic Fibrosis and Lung TransplantationChest, 1991