Entangled evidence: epistemic injustice, and systemic neglect in the assessment of menstrual disorders following COVID-19 vaccines
Open Access
- 20 January 2025
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Critical Public Health
- Vol. 35 (1)
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Women’s Representation in RCTs Evaluating FDA-Supervised Medical DevicesJAMA Internal Medicine, 2024
- Case Study Research2022
- The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Menstruation Studies2020
- Review of average sized male and female occupant models in European regulatory safety assessment tests and European laws: Gaps and bridging suggestionsAccident Analysis & Prevention, 2019
- No association between HPV vaccine and reported post-vaccination symptoms in Japanese young women: Results of the Nagoya studyPapillomavirus Research, 2018
- Epistemic injustice in healthcare: a philosophial analysisMedicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 2014
- Evidence-based medicine: Revisiting the pyramid of prioritiesJournal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, 2012
- Illnesses you have to fight to get: Facts as forces in uncertain, emergent illnessesSocial Science & Medicine, 2006
- The medical text: between biomedicine and hegemonySocial Science & Medicine, 2004
- EXPERIENCES WITH PROPHYLACTIC TYPHOID VACCINATIONArchives of internal medicine (1908), 1913