Diagnostic Accuracy of Abbreviated Bi-Parametric MRI (a-bpMRI) for Prostate Cancer Detection and Screening: A Multi-Reader Study
Authors:
- Giorgio BrembillaGBGiorgio Brembilla
- Francesco GigantiFGFrancesco Giganti
- Harbir SidhuHSHarbir Sidhu
- Massimo ImbriacoMIMassimo Imbriaco
- Sue MallettSMSue Mallett
- Armando StabileASArmando Stabile
- Alex FreemanAFAlex Freeman
- Hashim U. AhmedHAHashim U. Ahmed
- Caroline MooreCMCaroline Moore
- Mark EmbertonMEMark Emberton
- Shonit PunwaniSPShonit Punwani
Open Access
- 18 January 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Diagnostics
- Vol. 12 (2) , 231
Abstract
(1) Background: There is currently limited evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of abbreviated biparametric MRI (a-bpMRI) protocols for prostate cancer (PCa) detection and screening. In the present study, we aim to investigate the performance of a-bpMRI among multiple readers and its potential application to an imaging-based screening setting. (2) Methods: A total of 151 men who underwent 3T multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) of the prostate and transperineal template prostate mapping biopsies were retrospectively selected. Corresponding bpMRI (multiplanar T2WI, DWI, ADC maps) and a-bpMRI (axial T2WI and b 2000 s/mm2 DWI only) dataset were derived from mpMRI. Three experienced radiologists scored a-bpMRI, standard biparametric MRI (bpMRI) and mpMRI in separate sessions. Diagnostic accuracy and interreader agreement of a-bpMRI was tested for different positivity thresholds and compared to bpMRI and mpMRI. Predictive values of a-bpMRI were computed for lower levels of PCa prevalence to simulate a screening setting. The primary definition of clinically significant PCa (csPCa) was Gleason ≥ 4 + 3, or cancer core length ≥ 6 mm. (3) Results: The median age was 62 years, the median PSA was 6.8 ng/mL, and the csPCa prevalence was 40%. Using a cut off of MRI score ≥ 3, the sensitivity and specificity of a-bpMRI were 92% and 48%, respectively. There was no significant difference in sensitivity compared to bpMRI and mpMRI. Interreader agreement of a-bpMRI was moderate (AC1 0.58). For a low prevalence of csPCa (e.g., <10%), higher cut offs (MRI score ≥ 4) yield a more favourable balance between the predictive values and positivity rate of MRI. (4) Conclusion: Abbreviated bpMRI protocols could match the diagnostic accuracy of bpMRI and mpMRI for the detection of csPCa. If a-bpMRI is used in low-prevalence settings, higher cut-offs for MRI positivity should be prioritised.Keywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- The PICTURE study — Prostate Imaging (multi-parametric MRI and Prostate HistoScanning™) Compared to Transperineal Ultrasound guided biopsy for significant prostate cancer Risk EvaluationContemporary Clinical Trials, 2014
- Results of Initial Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening for Lung CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2013
- Characterizing Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Using Template Prostate Mapping BiopsyJournal of Urology, 2011
- Computing inter‐rater reliability and its variance in the presence of high agreementBritish Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 2008
- Comparison of predictive values of two diagnostic tests from the same sample of subjects using weighted least squaresStatistics in Medicine, 2005
- Prevalence of Prostate Cancer among Men with a Prostate-Specific Antigen Level ≤4.0 ng per MilliliterNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Comparisons of Predictive Values of Binary Medical Diagnostic Tests for Paired DesignsBiometrics, 2000
- Statistics Notes: Diagnostic tests 2: predictive valuesBMJ, 1994
- Benefit of independent double reading in a population-based mammography screening program.Radiology, 1994
- High agreement but low kappa: II. Resolving the paradoxesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1990