MICESE: A New Method Used for the Formulation of Key Messages from the Scientific Community for the EU Post 2020 Biodiversity Strategy
Open Access
- 18 March 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Sustainability
- Vol. 12 (6) , 2385
Abstract
The European Union (EU) 2020 Biodiversity strategy will soon come to an end and may not have been as successful as envisioned. In the current context of the global biodiversity crisis, the European Commission, the research community, and broader society cannot risk another, likely ineffective, attempt by the EU to halt biodiversity loss after 2020. Through the development of the EU post 2020 Biodiversity Strategy, the scientific community of the ALTER-Net and EKLIPSE networks saw a unique opportunity to make a difference for biodiversity in Europe by better involving scientists, policy makers, and society. We developed an innovative, transparent, and collaborative process—called the multiphased, iterative, and consultative elicitation of scientific expertise (MICESE) method. This process allowed us to produce a set of 12 key messages developed by scientists for the EU to prioritize in the development of the new post 2020 biodiversity strategy. These key messages were structured according to their systemic value, scale, and nature. We provide insights and analyses of the new MICESE method before reflecting on how to improve the future involvement of scientists in science–policy interfaces.Keywords
Funding Information
- Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (690474)
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Perspectives on Citizen Engagement for the EU Post-2020 Biodiversity Strategy: An Empirical StudySustainability, 2020
- EKLIPSE: engaging knowledge holders and networks for evidence-informed European policy on biodiversity and ecosystem servicesEvidence & Policy, 2019
- Global SDGs Assessments: Helping or Confusing Indicators?Sustainability, 2018
- Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?Sustainability, 2017
- Arguing for biodiversity in practice: a case study from the UKBiodiversity and Conservation, 2016
- Taking stock of the spectrum of arguments for biodiversityBiodiversity and Conservation, 2016
- Sustainable Development Goals: A need for relevant indicatorsEcological Indicators, 2016
- Science, Uncertainty, and Values in Ecological Restoration: A Case Study in Structured Decision‐Making and Adaptive ManagementRestoration Ecology, 2012
- Eliciting Expert Knowledge in Conservation ScienceConservation Biology, 2012
- Generation of Priority Research Questions to Inform Conservation Policy and Management at a National LevelConservation Biology, 2010