Prevention and treatment of meningeal leukemia in children
Authors:
Open Access
- 15 July 1994
- journal article
- Published by American Society of Hematology in Blood
- Vol. 84 (2) , 355-366
Abstract
The prevention of meningeal leukemia has long been a keystone in its cure. The need was recognized when it became apparent in the 1950s and 1960s that meningeal relapse heralded hematologic relapse and a fatal course and that its incidence increased as systemic chemotherapy became more effective in controlling hematologic and visceral leukemia. Evasion of a biologic safety net, the blood-CSF barrier, is required to prevent meningeal leukemia. Three methods are used: meningeal radiotherapy, intrathecal administration of antileukemia drugs, and high-dosage intravenous antileukemia drugs. Recent and current clinical studies reflect a continuing dialogue about which methods are preferable and under what circumstances. For prevention of meningeal leukemia, extended intrathecal therapy and intensive systemic chemotherapy appear to be as effective as radiotherapy for most patients. For treatment of overt meningeal leukemia, meningeal radiotherapy may be necessary. However, its administration compromises subsequent systemic chemotherapy so that delay may be advisable to allow intensive systemic chemotherapy for control of concurrent hematologic and visceral leukemia, whether clinically evident or not. For patients with meningeal leukemia at diagnosis, cranial irradiation may be delayed or possibly omitted if evidence of disease is minimal and intrathecal and systemic chemotherapy are intensive. For those who develop meningeal leukemia while on therapy or after its completion, cranial or craniospinal irradiation is probably required as well as intensive intrathecal and systemic chemotherapy. Hopefully, current and future studies will dispel the uncertainties and better quantitate risks and benefits of alternative methods. Whatever method is used, careful attention to technical details is required to assure optimal efficacy at the least possible expense in immediate toxicity and late sequelae.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- A pilot study of intermediate‐dose methotrexate and cytosine arabinoside, “Spread‐out” or “Up‐front,” in continuation therapy for childhood non‐T, non‐B acute lymphoblastic leukemia a pediatric oncology group studyCancer, 1991
- Lower incidence of meningeal leukemia when prednisone is replaced by dexamethasone in the treatment of acute lymphocytic leukemiaMedical and Pediatric Oncology, 1991
- High‐dose methotrexate improves clinical outcome in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: St. Jude total therapy study XMedical and Pediatric Oncology, 1988
- Report and recommendations of the rome workshop concerning poor‐prognosis acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children: Biologic bases for staging, stratification, and treatmentMedical and Pediatric Oncology, 1986
- Comparison of maintenance treatment regimens for first central nervous system relapse in children with acute lymphocytic leukemia. A pediatric oncology group studyCancer, 1985
- The leptomeningeal vein. A site of re-entry of leukemic cells into the systemic circulationCancer, 1984
- The pharmacokinetics of cytosine arabinoside in the plasma and cerebrospinal fluid during conventional and high-dose therapyMedical and Pediatric Oncology, 1982
- Medulloblastoma: An analysis of time-dose relationships and recurrence patternsCancer, 1973
- The central nervous system in childhood leukemia: I. The arachnoidCancer, 1973
- Intrathecal Amethopterin in Neurological Manifestations of LeukemiaArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1958