The labor economics of paid crowdsourcing
Authors:
Open Access
- 7 June 2010
- conference paper
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 209-218
Abstract
We present a model of workers supplying labor to paid crowdsourcing projects. We also introduce a novel method for estimating a worker's reservation wage - the key parameter in our labor supply model. We tested our model by presenting experimental subjects with real-effort work scenarios that varied in the offered payment and difficulty. As predicted, subjects worked less when the pay was lower. However, they did not work less when the task was more time-consuming. Interestingly, at least some subjects appear to be "target earners," contrary to the assumptions of the rational model. The strongest evidence for target earning is an observed preference for earning total amounts evenly divisible by 5, presumably because these amounts make good targets. Despite its predictive failures, we calibrate our model with data pooled from both experiments. We find that the reservation wages of our sample are approximately log normally distributed, with a median wage of $1.38/hour. We discuss how to use our calibrated model in applications.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Crowdsourcing, attention and productivityJournal of Information Science, 2009
- Crowdsourcing and all-pay auctions2009
- Designing incentives for online question and answer forums2009
- Financial incentives and the "performance of crowds"2009
- Reference-Dependent Preferences and Labor Supply: The Case of New York City Taxi DriversAmerican Economic Review, 2008
- Knowledge sharing and yahoo answers2008
- Do Workers Work More if Wages Are High? Evidence from a Randomized Field ExperimentAmerican Economic Review, 2007
- Games with a PurposeComputer, 2006
- The Economist as Engineer: Game Theory, Experimentation, and Computation as Tools for Design EconomicsEconometrica, 2002
- Labor Supply of New York City Cabdrivers: One Day at a TimeThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1997