Risk of wound infection with use of sterile versus clean gloves in wound repair at the Emergency Department: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Hawthorne effectBMJ, 2011
- Heightened Infection-Control Practices are Associated with Significantly Lower Infection Rates in Office-Based Mohs SurgeryDermatologic Surgery, 2010
- Minor surgery in general practice: are sterilised gloves necessary?British Journal of General Practice, 2008
- Infection control practices and infectious complications in dermatological surgeryJournal of Hospital Infection, 2007
- A comparison of post-operative complications following wisdom tooth surgery performed with sterile or clean glovesInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2006
- Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendationsBMJ, 2004
- Sterile versus nonsterile gloves for repair of uncomplicated lacerations in the emergency departmentAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 2004
- Non‐inferiority trials: design concepts and issues – the encounters of academic consultants in statisticsStatistics in Medicine, 2002
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986
- SURGICAL GLOVES DURING WOUND REPAIR IN THE ACCIDENT-AND-EMERGENCY DEPARTMENTThe Lancet, 1982