External Cervical Resorption Treatment: A Single‐Center Retrospective Cohort Study of Cases Treated Over a 20‐Year Period
- 9 January 2026
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Dental Traumatology
- Vol. 42 (4) , 446-460
Abstract
Aim: External cervical resorption is a clinically challenging destructive process, with its etiology poorly understood. This study aimed to evaluate the survival of external cervical resorption treatments performed by a single operator over 20 years. Materials and Methods: A dataset of recalled external cervical resorption cases treated from 1996 to 2023 was created. The measured metrics included Heithersay classification, tooth type, historical treatment period, treatment modality, and pre‐treatment pulp status. Adverse sequelae such as extractions, revisions, and surgeries were analyzed. A multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed for independent predictors of tooth extraction. The analysis included Heithersay classification, tooth type, time period, and treatment modality. Results: The 5‐year censored survival rate was 83.6%. The most commonly treated resorption was Heithersay class 2, yielding a 5‐year survival rate of 89.5%. Anterior teeth exhibited the lowest survival rate (76.6%), and molars possessed the highest survival rate (95.2%) at 5 years. Combined non‐surgical endodontic treatment with surgery resulted in the highest five‐year survival rate (91.0%). A non‐surgical internal root approach yielded a survival rate of 82.2% at 5 years. No statistical survival difference was observed between the teeth initially presenting with root canal filling, as necrotic, or with vital pulps. The treatment period from 2014 to 2018 exhibited the highest survival rate at 93.3%. The hazard ratio was highest for anterior teeth at 6.225. Adverse sequelae were noted in 29.7% ( n = 47) of the cases. These included root fracture, progressive resorption, endodontic pathosis, periodontal pockets, and percussion sensitivity; root fracture led to extraction, and other sequelae could be managed. Conclusions: The clinical management of external cervical resorption has previously been regarded as unpredictable, with outcomes often considered short‐to‐medium term and frequently leading to eventual extraction. This study suggests that most teeth with external cervical resorption can be treated successfully and saved.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Development of a Core Outcome Set in Endodontics (COS-ENDO): Part 2 – COS-ENDO for Studies of Nonsurgical Root Canal Treatment and Retreatment in Permanent TeethJournal of Endodontics, 2025
- External Cervical Resorption: A Retrospective Case-Control StudyJournal of Endodontics, 2020
- The Assessment and Management of External Cervical Resorption with Periapical Radiographs and Cone-beam Computed Tomography: A Clinical StudyJournal of Endodontics, 2016
- Invasive Cervical Resorption Class III in a Maxillary Central Incisor: Diagnosis and Follow-up by Means of Cone-Beam Computed TomographyJournal of Endodontics, 2010
- Management of Invasive Cervical Resorption: Observations from Three Private Practices and a Report of Three CasesJournal of Endodontics, 2010
- Method to Evaluate Inflammatory Root Resorption by Using Cone Beam Computed TomographyJournal of Endodontics, 2009
- External Cervical Resorption: A ReviewJournal of Endodontics, 2009
- Differentiation and functions of osteoclasts and odontoclasts in mineralized tissue resorptionMicroscopy Research and Technique, 2003
- Nonendodontic therapy for supraosseous extracanal invasive resorptionJournal of Endodontics, 1987
- Differential diagnosis of internal and external root resorptionJournal of Endodontics, 1976