Minimal important change for Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)

This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:

• Minimally important change was estimated for the Manchester–Oxford Foot Questionnaire after foot/ankle surgery
  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2014
• Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Foot and Ankle Research
  Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2013
• Transcultural adaptation and testing psychometric properties of the Korean version of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)
  Clinical Rheumatology, 2013
• Validation of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score in Adult Acquired Flatfoot Deformity
  Foot & Ankle International, 2013
• Clinimetrics corner: a closer look at the minimal clinically important difference (MCID)
  Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy, 2012
• The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study
  Quality of Life Research, 2010
• Reliability and validity of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score: a validation study from Iran
  Clinical Rheumatology, 2010
• Tradução e validação do questionário FAOS - FOOT and ankle outcome score para língua portuguesa
  Acta Ortopedica Brasileira, 2009
• Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes
  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2008
• Impact of patient‐reported outcome measures on routine practice: a structured review
  Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 2006