Multitask Learning over Shared Subspaces
Authors:
Preprint
Abstract
This paper uses constructs from the field of multitask machine learning to define pairs of learning tasks that either shared or did not share a common subspace. Human subjects then learnt these tasks using a feedback-based approach. We found, as hypothesised, that subject performance was significantly higher on the second task if it shared the same subspace as the first, an advantage that played out most strongly at the beginning of the second task. Additionally, accuracy was positively correlated over subjects learning same-subspace tasks but was not correlated for those learning different-subspace tasks. These results, and other aspects of learning dynamics, were compared to the behaviour of a Neural Network model trained using sequential Bayesian inference. Human performance was found to be consistent with a Soft Parameter Sharing variant of this model that constrained representations to be similar among tasks but only when this aided learning. We propose that the concept of shared subspaces provides a useful framework for the experimental study of human multitask and transfer learning. Author summary How does knowledge gained from previous experience affect learning of new tasks ? This question of “Transfer Learning” has been addressed by teachers, psychologists, and more recently by researchers in the fields of neural networks and machine learning. Leveraging constructs from machine learning, we designed pairs of learning tasks that either shared or did not share a common subspace. We compared the dynamics of transfer learning in humans with those of a multitask neural network model, finding that human performance was consistent with a soft parameter sharing variant of the model. Learning was boosted in the early stages of the second task if the same subspace was shared between tasks. Additionally, accuracy between tasks was positively correlated but only when they shared the same subspace. Our results highlight the roles of subspaces, showing how they could act as a learning boost if shared, and be detrimental if not.Keywords
All Related Versions
- Published version: PLOS Computational Biology, 17 (7), e1009092.
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reversal Learning and Dopamine: A Bayesian PerspectiveJournal of Neuroscience, 2015
- New directions in cognitive training: on methods, transfer, and applicationPsychological Research, 2014
- On the validity and generality of transfer effects in cognitive training researchPsychological Research, 2014
- Reasoning, Learning, and Creativity: Frontal Lobe Function and Human Decision-MakingPLOS Biology, 2012
- Trial-by-trial data analysis using computational models2011
- Structure learning in actionBehavioural Brain Research, 2010
- Interactive memory systems in the human brainNature, 2001
- The Psychophysics ToolboxSpatial Vision, 1997
- Linear separability in classification learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1981
- Learning and memorization of classifications.Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 1961