Exploring Perceptions of Sustainable Development in South Korea: An Approach Based on Advocacy Coalition Framework’s Belief System
Open Access
- 8 November 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity
- Vol. 4 (4) , 54
Abstract
The concept of sustainable development has been criticized for its broadness and ambiguity that permits different interpretations in separate views. However, the prior studies on sustainable development generally relied on survey data, so they have some limitations that preclude congruent conclusions. In contrast to prior studies, we used Q methodology, which is designed to investigate subjective perceptions as it is. This study aims to explore the South Koreans’ perceptions of sustainable development among various stakeholders such as experts, bureaucrats, legislatures, civic group members, company employees, and journalists. Based on the hierarchical belief system of the advocacy coalition framework, we classified all statements into three categories: core value, policy core, and secondary aspects. Using Q methodology, we extracted five types: (1) democrat; (2) idealist; (3) green growth advocate; (4) skeptics; and (5) elitist. We examined the distribution of the five types according to a hierarchical belief system, and discussed implications of the findings.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Exploring institutional reform of Korean civil service pension: advocacy coalition framework, policy knowledge and social innovationJournal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 2018
- Connecting corporations and communities: Towards a theory of social inclusive open innovationJournal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 2017
- Open Innovation: Technology, Market and Complexity in South KoreaScience, Technology and Society, 2016
- How do we conquer the growth limits of capitalism? Schumpeterian Dynamics of Open InnovationJournal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 2015
- Coalitions, Science, and Belief Change: Comparing Adversarial and Collaborative Policy SubsystemsPolicy Studies Journal, 2009
- Grassroots innovations for sustainable development: Towards a new research and policy agendaEnvironmental Politics, 2007
- Q Methodology and Qualitative ResearchQualitative Health Research, 1996
- ‘Sustainable Development’: Is it a Useful Concept?Environmental Values, 1994
- Strategy And Ideology In Environmentalism: A Decentered Approach To SustainabilityIndustrial & Environmental Crisis Quarterly, 1994
- An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning thereinPolicy Sciences, 1988